The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that the Glauconitica zone of Chile's southernmost Magallanes region holds nearly 8.3 trillion cubic feet of technically recoverable, unconventional tight gas, or nearly double Chile's production of that fossil fuel over the past 70 years. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesthe little poison dwarff will be screaming its. mine. its mine
Feb 04th, 2016 - 11:57 am - Link - Report abuse 0What this story did not mention:
Feb 04th, 2016 - 12:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 01. Extraction costs for this potential unconventional source are comparatively high.
2. Chilean sales of natural gas right now are done at a net loss within the Magallanes region, since the sales are heavily subsidised. ENAP operates at a huge deficit due to the subsidies schedule. The annual residential subsidies involve about US$77 million for the region with only about 163,000 people. This means that residents pay only a tiny fraction of the market value of the natural gas and as a result, energy conservation is severely lacking. Since it's cheaper to burn excessive amounts of nearly free gas, there is little interest in energy-efficient construction methods and materials and many houses have no wall or ceiling insulation at all.
3. ...hoping to make Chile in the short term natural gas self sufficient... would be impractical since the aggregate of production, liquefaction/regasification, transport, existing and predicted subsidies, and other costs would be significantly higher than near-term costs using existing suppliers.
The current extremely high subsidies for residential natural gas in this region are the result of the socialist governments prior to 2011, and the demonstrations that took place that year objecting to reductions in subsidies. The demonstrations resulted in significant economic harm to the region and caused the Chilean military to evacuate foreign tourists who were trapped by the protesters. Unlike the current Macri government in Argentina, the national government in Chile has repeatedly shown itself to be too weak to significantly reduce these natural gas subsidies.
The original USGS report from which the article's material was extracted is here: Assessment of Unconventional Tight-Gas Resources of the
Magallanes Basin Province, Chile, 2015
A rather uneven discussion of the 2011 gas-subsidies rebellion is here https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestas_en_Magallanes_de_2011
Perhaps the USGS should speak to Dilma....she seems to be holding in a lot of unconventional tight gas in her midriff....I doubt it would help Brazilians much but I'm sure it would empty Congress of the opposition if she decided to let it go free in there...
Feb 06th, 2016 - 11:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!