The deputy from the ruling Workers’ Party has appealed to Brazil’s Supreme Court in an effort to block the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff ahead of Wednesday’s Senate vote.
Deputy Paulo Teixeira asked the court to annul a vote taken on April 17, saying political leaders had exercised illegal and improper pressure on their members, local news media reported.
At a plenary session on that day, an overwhelming majority of parliament (367 to 146 members) voted to launch impeachment proceedings against the populist president, whom the opposition accuses of illegally manipulating government budget numbers to help her re-election chances in 2014.
Teixeira based his argument on the fact that the high court had on Thursday suspended the speaker of the lower house of Congress, Eduardo Cunha – the powerful man at the centre of the efforts to impeach Rousseff – on grounds he had tried to obstruct an inquiry into his own alleged corruption in the Petrobras scandal.
Teixeira alleges that parliament leaders, under heavy pressure from Cunha, “clearly violated” the deputies’ right under Brazilian law to vote freely on impeachment matters, according to their conscience and not in lockstep with their parties.
He said that several deputies had voted the way they did for fear of reprisals, including possible expulsion from their parties. Some members abstained.
But the high court appears disinclined to overturn the vote of Congress. If opinion polls and press commentators are right, Rousseff will be removed from office by a majority vote of senators on Wednesday and will face trial on allegations of budgetary manipulation.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesThis will be thrown out - absolutely inconsistent with the Constitution and the impeachment rite as established by the Supreme Court.
May 09th, 2016 - 07:19 pm 0The impeachment vote has been annulled. For now.
May 09th, 2016 - 08:45 pm 0http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/world/americas/brazil-dilma-rousseff.html?_r=0
The Presiudent of the Senate has said that the impeachment chronogram will carry on as scheduled, and that the Waldir Maranhão's decision (to annul the vote in the Lower house) is illegal...regardless, it will probably have to be decided by the Supreme Court, where I don't see the Justices going back on what they decided two months ago, or, the impeachment ritual which they themselves established . Never a dull moment.
May 09th, 2016 - 09:24 pm 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!