MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 22nd 2024 - 14:47 UTC

 

 

Antarctic Treaty parties reaffirm commitment to ban on mining in the Antarctic

Thursday, June 2nd 2016 - 08:29 UTC
Full article 2 comments
”Parties stand firm in their commitment that preserving the continent as a place of peace and science is more important than financial gain” said Claire Christian ”Parties stand firm in their commitment that preserving the continent as a place of peace and science is more important than financial gain” said Claire Christian
ATCM issued the “Santiago Declaration on the Twenty Fifth Anniversary of the signing of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty” ATCM issued the “Santiago Declaration on the Twenty Fifth Anniversary of the signing of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty”
“ASOC supports the swift designation of comprehensive networks of marine and terrestrial protected areas” said Rodolfo Werner, ASOC's senior advisor. “ASOC supports the swift designation of comprehensive networks of marine and terrestrial protected areas” said Rodolfo Werner, ASOC's senior advisor.

The 29 countries party to the Antarctic Treaty unanimously agreed on Wednesday to a resolution at the 39th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) stating their “firm commitment to retain and continue to implement…as a matter of highest priority” the ban on mining activities in the Antarctic, which is part of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (also called the Madrid Protocol).

 The resolution was initiated by the United States to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the 1991 signing of the Protocol.
In addition to commemorating the 25th Anniversary, the Resolution is in part a response to inaccurate media reports that the Protocol or the Antarctic Treaty “expire” in 2048, when in fact this is only a date at which a review of the Protocol could be requested.

“There is often speculation that countries involved in Antarctic governance intend to review and change the Protocol in 2048 to allow mining. This resolution sends a clear message that this is not in fact the case and that Parties stand firm in their commitment that preserving the continent as a place of peace and science is more important than possible financial gain” said Claire Christian, Acting Executive Director of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), an organization that represents environmental NGOs at the ATCM.

The Protocol is a landmark environmental protection agreement that requires strict rules and procedures for the conduct of activities in the Antarctic. Prior to the signing of the Protocol, Antarctic Treaty Parties negotiated an agreement regulating mining in the Antarctic. However, the mining agreement never entered into force.

The decision not to ratify the mining agreement was led by Australia and France, and came after years of campaigning for a “World Park Antarctica” by the ASOC and its member groups. Though the Protocol contains many important provisions, the mining ban is especially critical because there would be no way to conduct mineral resource extraction activities without causing irreversible damage to one of the world’s last great wildernesses. ASOC is pleased to see this reaffirmation of one of the Protocol’s key principles.

The ATCM also issued the “Santiago Declaration on the Twenty Fifth Anniversary of the signing of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty” to confirm their commitment to all of the principles of the Protocol and to pledge further efforts to implement the Protocol and “preserve and protect the Antarctic terrestrial and marine environments.”

The ATCM also discussed Antarctic climate change and tourism, two issues with implications for the environmental protection of the region. With information indicating that the impact of climate change and ocean acidification is already having an impact on Antarctica and its ecosystems, the Antarctic Treaty System has become increasingly focused on developing ways to monitor and respond to climate change. ASOC has been a key proponent in getting treaty parties to take climate change seriously.

This was demonstrated by a joint workshop held between the ATCM’s Committee for Environmental Protection (CEP) and the Scientific Committee of the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). CCAMLR is an international, treaty-based organization with the objective of conserving Antarctic marine life. The workshop acknowledged that marine and terrestrial protected areas can serve as important scientific reference areas that can increase understanding of the impacts of climate change. “ASOC supports the swift designation of comprehensive networks of marine and terrestrial protected areas, a process which has proceeded very slowly despite urgent need,” said Rodolfo Werner, ASOC's senior advisor.

On tourism, the ATCM discussed that tourism numbers are projected to increase to their highest level ever in the coming year. ASOC believes that this will require an additional response from Antarctic Treaty Parties to ensure that this activity has a minimal footprint on the fragile Antarctic environment. “Parties are developing a strategic vision for tourism, but there are key actions that should be taken now, such as prohibiting the development of land-based infrastructure, to preserve the unique values of the Antarctic region,” said Ricardo Roura, ASOC’s tourism expert.

The XXXIX ATCM was held from 23 May to June 1, 2016 in Santiago, Chile.

Categories: Politics, Antarctica.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Idlehands

    This is about global realpolitik more than environmental protection. The “great wilderness” that is Antarctica has the least diversity of life on the land mass of any continent. While the seas around it are abundant there's not a lot to protect on land.

    It's a shame the world isn't more united when it comes to other environmental issues that are far more pressing and beneficial to humanity - like allowing the oceans to recover from over fishing.

    Jun 02nd, 2016 - 08:56 am 0
  • Briton

    Still think fish farms on a grand scale may well work,

    eat half, let the other half free into the sea to breed.
    [ no I don't mean half of a fish ]

    Jun 03rd, 2016 - 11:56 am 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!