MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
Malvinas is no impediment for dealing with UK, but “Islands population can't be denied”
“Despite this territorial dispute we can't deny the existence of the Malvinas inhabitants with whom we have been distanced for too long”, admitted Malcorra The Malvinas sovereignty dispute should not be an impediment to advance in a pro-active agenda with the United Kingdom, and to progress in agreements to attract investors to Argentina, said foreign minister Susana Malcorra, who also admitted that it's not possible to deny the existence of the Malvinas inhabitants, “of which we have been distanced for too long”.
At a conference on Argentine foreign policy at the Torcuato Di Tella University in Buenos Aires Malcorra insisted that focusing relations with the UK on the Malvinas issue is “a partial view”. Nevertheless Malvinas “is a clear sovereignty issue, a territorial dispute between two states, and despite this territorial dispute we can't deny the existence of the Malvinas inhabitants with whom we have been distanced for too long”.
“Denying the existence of the others only impedes advancing in a solution for the Malvinas issue. The opportunities to hold meetings are to solve problems”, affirmed the head of Argentine diplomacy.
Malcorra said that historically the Argentine position was not to acknowledge for this case in particular the “self determination of peoples”, because 'kelpers' (Falkland Islanders) are a transplanted population, not aborigine. The UK supports the opposite and a few years ago encouraged the Islanders to hold a referendum to vote if they wished to continue as British citizens, and Argentina obviously ignored the result“.
The minister added there is great interest from the UK to invest and make business with Argentina and ”we believe that the Malvinas question should not be an impediment. Links with the UK are very important, since the UK in a major player in world affairs and has historic links with Argentina“
In reference to the previous Argentine governments, Malcorra said they had ”an overview of the world along ideological lines and this limited opportunities“.
Malcorra's statements follows the recent Business Networking Day event organized by the British Argentina Chamber of Commerce and sponsored by Argentine ambassador in London, Carlos Sersale di Cerisano, and where Foreign Office minister for the Americas, Alan Duncan was quoted saying ”Argentina is the first among a list of eligible and capable countries of attracting British investments”.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rules-
-
-
Read all comments“Thus why Anglos can claim ONLY Argentines should vacate the American continent but all others in South, Central, and especially North America are not squatters”
Nov 10th, 2016 - 04:19 pm +10What a stupid comment. “Anglos” claim no such thing and respect the fact that Argentines are just as legitimate a people in SA as are Brazilians, Paraguayans, Canadians or whatever. That includes the Falkland Islanders.
But...
Argentines are clearly hypocrites when they claim that this right does not extend to the Falkland Islanders.
So your 'Anglo' statement is nonsense. We only say that “if you insist that Falklanders are squatters and shoudl vacate Latin America, then you are yourselves - by definition - squatters and should also vacate South America”.
Stop trying to claim people say something that they didn't say in the first place.
Weak trolling indeed. You'll have to up your game a bit there,
What she's trying to say is that Argentina will lose opportunities it cannot reasonably afford to lose if it doesn't grow-up regards its attitude towards the Falkland Islands.
Nov 10th, 2016 - 08:31 am +9What this MP article doesn't go as far to say is that the Argentine Government has confirmed that they will now recognise and deal with the Falkland Islands Government as of this week.
''Malcorra said that historically the Argentine position was not to acknowledge for this case in particular the “self determination of peoples”, because 'kelpers' (Falkland Islanders) are a transplanted population, not aborigine...''
Nov 10th, 2016 - 10:02 am +8Ha ha
Article 49, Para 6 of the Fourth Genevan Convention of 1949 is the legislation that refers to Implanted Populations. Article 2 regarding the application of the Fourth Geneva Convention states, ‘In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or any other armed conflict’ and article 153 ‘coming into force’ – the present Convention shall come into force six months after ratification (21 October 1950). In reference to the treaty application, the ICJ Ambatielos judgment dealt with retroactive effects of treaties and stated, ‘all provisions of the Treaty shall come into force immediately upon ratification. Such a conclusion might have been rebutted if there had been any special clause or any special object necessitating retroactive interpretation. There is no such clause or object in the present case. It is therefore impossible to hold that any of its provisions must be deemed to have been in force earlier.’
The whole mythical Malvinas claim is fraudulent and based around denying rights and a false inheritance claim.
The concept that Argentina had inherited the Falkland Islands from Spain is false. The law of the time did not accept inheritance without settlement and stated that 'an unopposed settlement of some years was necessary” before sovereignty was accepted. (The Law of Nations, Vattel, Cpt XI, p337) Vernet had sought acquiescence from the British consul in Buenos Aires on two occasions before establishing “his” colonies and the British protested when he was appointed military and political governor by the BA. Authorities. Jewett had no settlement. There is ample evidence that this has been the mode of applying / not applyin
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!