Theresa May is being urged to secure changes from the EU to the Northern Irish backstop element of her Brexit deal to get it past parliament. Ex-foreign secretary Boris Johnson says winning a freedom clause would be unadulterated good Brexit news.
MPs on Tuesday will vote on a series of amendments to the PM's plans that could shape the future direction of Brexit.
But the Irish deputy PM says changes to the backstop - aimed at preventing a hard border - would not be acceptable.
The backstop plan - a fallback position to avoid the return of customs checks at the Irish border if the UK fails to agree a deal with the EU - is a major sticking point for opponents of Mrs May's withdrawal agreement.
It has proved unpopular with many Brexit-supporting Conservative MPs who are concerned that it could tie the UK to many EU rules indefinitely.
After Mrs May's deal was rejected in the Commons on 15 January by 432 votes to 202, opposition and backbench MPs have been tabling amendments to the plans. While MPs will not deliver their final verdict on the deal on Tuesday, they will vote on the amendments.
One that has the backing of senior Tory Sir Graham Brady, the chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee, calls for the backstop to be replaced by alternative arrangements.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Westminster Hour, Sir Graham said it was the kind of compromise forward that can actually attract the support of a majority in the house of Commons - I hope it will and demonstrate in terms to the EU there is a way forward for the withdrawal agreement.
Brexiteers say if the non-binding amendment is passed it will give the PM more leeway to win concessions from the EU.
Writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr, Johnson suggested Mrs May could get the EU to change the text of her agreement to include an expiry date for the backstop, or include a mechanism allowing the UK to unilaterally withdraw from it.
Mr Johnson said: If the PM secures that change - a proper UK-sized perforation in the fabric of the backstop itself - I have no doubt that she will have the whole country full-throatedly behind her.
Reiterating earlier comments that the EU would not ratify a deal without the backstop being included, the Irish Republic's deputy prime minister and foreign minister Simon Coveney said: Even in a no-deal Brexit situation every party and every MP in the UK will have a responsibility to ensure there is no return to a hard border and Northern Ireland is protected.
He added: The EU has been clear that the backstop is an integral part of the withdrawal agreement.
The UK is due to leave the EU at 23:00 GMT on 29 March, and the prime minister has faced repeated calls to rule out the prospect of leaving without a deal if her agreement does not win approval.
It is also possible that MPs will back amendments on Tuesday which call on Mrs May to rule out no deal or to delay the UK's departure from the EU.
An amendment tabled by Labour MP Yvette Cooper could extend Article 50 - which triggers the UK's withdrawal from the EU - by nine months, unless the prime minister can secure a deal by the end of February.
Appearing on the BBC's Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Ms Cooper said she was not seeking to block Brexit, adding that the bill would be amendable - meaning MPs could vote on how long any extension would be.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesTheresa May is being urged to secure changes from the EU to the Northern Irish backstop element of her Brexit deal to get it past parliament. Ex-foreign secretary Boris Johnson says winning a “freedom clause” would be “unadulterated good Brexit news”.
Jan 28th, 2019 - 12:29 pm 0One cannot but wonder if these people are born stupid or if it's the result of a long study?
It's over. The result of the negotiations is result of the negotiations and EU cannot and will not change it. Take it or leave it, blockheads.
She will get there otherwise the scerlotic superstate will get no deal and no dosh. Apparenly EU growth rate is about half ours.
Jan 30th, 2019 - 03:00 pm 0The EU has had a higher growth rate than the UK since the last quarter of 2016, while before that the UK was consistently ahead. Can you think of anything that happened in 2016 that might explain this slower growth?
Jan 30th, 2019 - 03:34 pm 0Also, are you ever going to explain how ending all free trade with other countries will magically make the economy grow 7%, Mr Peronist?
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!