A jury in California on Monday ordered Bayer-owned Monsanto to pay more than US$2 billion damages to a couple who sued on grounds the weed killer Roundup caused their cancer, lawyers said.
The award was the latest in a series of court defeats for Monsanto over Roundup. The company insists the glyphosate-based product is not linked to cancer.
The couple's legal team described the damages award as historic, saying it totaled US$2.055 billion after adding in slightly more than US$55 million in compensatory damages.
The jury saw for themselves internal company documents demonstrating that, from day one, Monsanto has never had any interest in finding out whether Roundup is safe, said plaintiff's counsel Brent Wisner.
Instead of investing in sound science, they invested millions in attacking science that threatened their business agenda.
In a statement, Bayer said it was disappointed with the jury's decision and would appeal the verdict, which it argues was at odds with a recent US Environmental Protection Agency review of glyphosate-based weed killers.
The consensus among leading health regulators worldwide is that glyphosate-based products can be used safely and that glyphosate is not carcinogenic, Bayer said.
The verdict in a California state court in Oakland was the third courtroom defeat for Bayer in cases accusing the chemicals in Roundup of causing cancer.
Glyphosate developer Monsanto was convicted in the United States in 2018 and 2019 of not taking necessary steps to warn of the potential risks of Roundup - their weed-killer containing the chemical, which two California juries found caused cancer in two users.
Unlike the first two Monsanto trials, where the judges severely limited the amount of plaintiffs' evidence, we were finally allowed to show a jury the mountain of evidence showing Monsanto's manipulation of science, the media and regulatory agencies to forward their own agenda despite Roundup's severe harm to the animal kingdom and humankind, said attorney Michael Miller, who was co-lead trial counsel along with Wisner.
Bayer announced last month that over 13,000 lawsuits related to the weed killer had been launched in the US.
The stunning verdict came the same day that German chemical giant Bayer admitted that its subsidiary Monsanto could have kept lists of key figures - for or against pesticides - in European countries.
Bayer apologized on Sunday after it emerged that Monsanto had a PR agency collate lists of French politicians, scientists and journalists, with their views on pesticides and GM crops.
I think it's very likely that such lists also exist in other European countries, Matthias Berninger, Bayer's head of Public Affairs, told journalists in a conference call.
Berninger said he firmly believes that other countries in Europe will be affected.
We consider what we have seen so far to be completely inappropriate, he said.
However, we were of the opinion that the reports of these dealings with journalists, politicians and activists are not in order and not in agreement with what Bayer stands for.”
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!
Round Up is safe if properly handled and applied. But on my, and neighboring farms, I have repeatedly seen people handling all types of poisons in the most irrational and dangerous ways possible. And no matter how much one yells at them,they keep on doing it!May 14th, 2019 - 12:29 pm 0
It's like cars, they are deadly unless one follows all the security requirements. The difference is that police don't go out to the farms to be sure people obey instructions and laws.
@viejopatagonMay 19th, 2019 - 12:49 pm 0
Why shouldn't the Errant/Inefficient/Corrupt Leaders be made to pay? If not, what kind of democracy is being practiced; where the population - derectly/indirectly -pays for the elections but punishing the incompetant is complicated?