The scandal surrounding Prince Andrew's friendship with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has deepened after a leading US prosecutor said requests to interview the senior royal - including from the FBI - had been ignored. Read full article
In my time, the oldest profession in the world was configured as the supplier of favours or services for some the pro assisted some times by a promoter which would be called the pimp, and then you had the client who paid for the services of the supplier of favours, and that was it, that is how that profession worked for millennia, there was no getting paid twice.
But things have changed: Women now are the ALLWAYS innocent victim, and are retroactively the trafficked, the friend / promoter who paid for plane tickets, entertainment etc. is now the trafficker and it seems to my astonishment that the client is now ALWAYS the guilty abuser / rapist regardless of what really happened!
In this case, in the worst case, I struggle to find anything wrong with anything the Prince could have done except to fall foul of the present rule of the feminists. I mean a 17 year old, consensual sex, totally legal in the UK!! Her photo denotes no anxiety with what she was doing.
What has the guy done wrong? In my case, if somebody had introduced me to a THEN beautiful young woman of 17, I have to be honest, I would have done what the Prince is said to have done, as a lot of other men would have done. Some of the things Andrew did are not all intelligent, but, even in the worst case, I can't find anything illegal and a matter for the FBI, I am sure that the 17 year old met many people in her activities, and there may be a fortune being debated in USA, but that is another matter, perhaps the real matter.
Google 'human trafficking'. Dunno exactly what happened in this case or how much Prince Andrew knew, but many women and girls aren't doing this 'work' voluntarily.
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesIn my time, the oldest profession in the world was configured as the supplier of favours or services for some the pro assisted some times by a promoter which would be called the pimp, and then you had the client who paid for the services of the supplier of favours, and that was it, that is how that profession worked for millennia, there was no getting paid twice.
Jan 28th, 2020 - 11:57 am - Link - Report abuse -2But things have changed: Women now are the ALLWAYS innocent victim, and are retroactively the trafficked, the friend / promoter who paid for plane tickets, entertainment etc. is now the trafficker and it seems to my astonishment that the client is now ALWAYS the guilty abuser / rapist regardless of what really happened!
In this case, in the worst case, I struggle to find anything wrong with anything the Prince could have done except to fall foul of the present rule of the feminists. I mean a 17 year old, consensual sex, totally legal in the UK!! Her photo denotes no anxiety with what she was doing.
What has the guy done wrong? In my case, if somebody had introduced me to a THEN beautiful young woman of 17, I have to be honest, I would have done what the Prince is said to have done, as a lot of other men would have done. Some of the things Andrew did are not all intelligent, but, even in the worst case, I can't find anything illegal and a matter for the FBI, I am sure that the 17 year old met many people in her activities, and there may be a fortune being debated in USA, but that is another matter, perhaps the real matter.
Google 'human trafficking'. Dunno exactly what happened in this case or how much Prince Andrew knew, but many women and girls aren't doing this 'work' voluntarily.
Jan 28th, 2020 - 11:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!