MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
Former Mendoza Deputy chosen for Argentina's Malvinas Secretariat
After Argentine President, Alberto Fernández appointed Daniel Filmus as Science Minister, the position of Malvinas Islands Secretary had been vacant until Foreign Minister Santiago Cafiero announced Friday he had chosen former Mendoza National Deputy Guillermo Carmona for the job. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesGreat non-job what's the pay like?
Sep 24th, 2021 - 06:10 pm - Link - Report abuse +2What a fantastic job. getting paid loads of money for doing nothing.
Sep 24th, 2021 - 06:51 pm - Link - Report abuse +3Apparently he, ‘intends to carry out’:
Sep 25th, 2021 - 12:11 pm - Link - Report abuse +4‘the execution of bilateral actions, assistance in negotiations, the design of strategies and the coordination of actions with all countries for the defence of Argentine rights and interests” over the Falkland / Malvinas Islands through the Secretariat.’
Marvellous.
The ‘good ole’, Malvinas Question Parliamentary Observatory.
I especially like their website claiming:
‘the entire southern region of America, with its coasts, seas and islands, was indisputably preserved under Spanish sovereignty through the various treaties signed in this period, such as the “American” Treaty of 1670, between Spain and England.
www.cuestionmalvinas.gob.ar/antecedentes-historicos/
When in fact the treaty of 1670 is only about the Caribbean, no mention of S. America whatsoever and the British make no recognition of any Spanish sovereignty of any territory anywhere.
If this is the standard of his attempts to re-wright history, he will cause no problems.
‘Kelpers sleep easy ...’
Ops, try this link.
Sep 25th, 2021 - 12:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0http://www.cuestionmalvinas.gob.ar/antecedentes-historicos/
He was also part of the Arg team that refused to meet with UK Foreign Office in London in 2013 - because there would be Falkland Islanders there as well!
Sep 25th, 2021 - 12:24 pm - Link - Report abuse +2Heil Hitler - the 3rd Reich still rules in his Department in Argentina - Islanders are low 3rd Class people you do even bother to talk to -Their Argentine plan remains unchanged - you just trample over and if they refuse to move - move them out!
On the other hand, you could say, Kelpers are like Kryptonite for Malvinazis.
Sep 25th, 2021 - 10:18 pm - Link - Report abuse +2That could prove to be useful, anytime other countries want to exclude Argentina, just invite the Kelpers, guarantees an Argy no-show, hummm.
101 uses for that ability.
“The entire southern region of America, with its coasts, seas and islands, was indisputably preserved under Spanish sovereignty through the various treaties signed in this period, such as the “American” Treaty of 1670, between Spain and England.”
Sep 30th, 2021 - 10:42 am - Link - Report abuse -1The UK can rely on the Peace of Utrecht, which explicitly bars any Argentine claim of succession.
“...it is hereby further agreed and concluded, that neither the Catholic King, nor any of his heirs and successors whatsoever, shall sell, yield, pawn, transfer, or by any means, or under any name, alienate from them and the crown of Spain, to the French, or to any other nations whatever, any lands, dominions, or territories, or any part thereof, belonging to Spain in America.”
The Nootka Convention: ”...Article VI provided that neither party would form new establishments on any of the islands adjacent to the east and west coasts of South America then occupied by Spain....... there was an additional secret article which stipulated that Article VI shall remain in force only so long as no establishment shall have been formed by the subjects of any other power on the coasts in question. This secret article had the same force as if it were inserted in the convention.......The United Provinces of the River Plate was not a party to the convention. Therefore it is defined in the convention as 'other power' and the occupation of the settlement (at Port Louis) by subjects of any other power negated Article VI and allowed Great Britain to re-assert prior sovereignty and form new settlements.
h ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nootka_Convention
Terry F*uckwitt
Sep 30th, 2021 - 09:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Rubbish Tel, as usual you are talking complete and utter rubbish, not understanding what you are copy/pasting.
attendere stultus, the Nootka Sound Conventions of 1790s are completely irrelevant where the Falklands are concerned, ‘secrete articles’ and all.
‘neither party would form new establishments on any of the islands adjacent to the east and west coasts of South America then occupied by Spain’
Firstly, British settlement of the Falklands (1765) was already established by 1790, just subtract 1765 from 1790, you can do that can’t you?
Secondly, ‘adjacent’ is defined as less than 100 NM from the coast, how far away are the Falklands? You know that don’t you?
Thirdly, in 1790 Spain did not then ‘occupy’ the coast of S. America opposite the Falklands, Spain never did, look up ‘the Conquest of the Desert’, where it was and when it was, it’s under Argentinian history, not Spanish, if you can manage that?
The article excludes the Falklands from the terms of the treaty on three counts, hence irrelevant.
Blithering Idiot.
.. -.. .. --- - / .-- .- -. -.- . .-. ,
The article excludes the Falklands from the terms of the treaty.
Sep 30th, 2021 - 10:52 pm - Link - Report abuse -1No, it doesn’t, otherwise it would specifically state there are exclusions. You can´t read into treaties what isn't there, perpetual loser.
“Territory Exclusions from Treaty Application
I. Definition
As matter of general practice, a treaty can expand or restrict the territorial scope of its application. The general rule is that a treaty is binding upon each party in respect of its entire territory unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established. This general rule applies with equal force to multilateral and bilateral investment treaties.”
https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/wiki/en-territory-exclusions-from-treaty-application
Terry F*uckwitt
Oct 01st, 2021 - 04:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0BAAAHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH.
You really, really do not understand what you are reading, or copy/pasting, never mind how to connect them.
I shouldn’t mock you because, Mate, you’re on a scale somewhere.
You CAN read what is CLEARLY WRITTEN in an agreement and this agreement, by your own admission, says:
‘neither party would form new establishments on any of the islands adjacent to the east and west coasts of South America then occupied by Spain’
British settlement of the Falklands was in 1765, hence not ‘new’ when the agreement was signed in 1790, putting it outside the terms of the agreement.
Then, ‘adjacent’ is defined as less than 100 NM from the coast, the Falklands are some 400 NM from the coast, putting them outside the terms of the agreement.
Finally, Spain never did ‘occupy’ the coast of S. America opposite the Falklands, putting the whole S. Atlantic, S. Georgia/S. Sandwich Isle and all, outside the scope of the agreement.
The Nootka Sound Convention does not apply to the Falklands in any way, shape or form, ‘secret articles’ notwithstanding.
Any more than it applies to Bermuda.
No wonder you are still a Virgin
.. -.. .. --- - / .-- .- -. -.- . .-. ,
Hmm try moving your lips when you read, it might help you too understand the following.
Oct 01st, 2021 - 06:08 pm - Link - Report abuse -1“The general rule is that a treaty is binding upon each party in respect of its entire territory unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established.”
Terry F*uckwitt
Oct 01st, 2021 - 10:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Ok Thicko, obviously you did not read and/or understand what was posted above.
It does state what is excluded, existing settlements, islands more than 100 NM away and anything not then facing a coast occupied by Spain, except if it was already existing or more than 100 NM away.
In the simplest terms possible, The Falklands ARE excluded from the treaty for the reasons described above.
To which, as usual, you have not answered a single point.
The Nootka Sound Convention does not apply to the Falklands in any way, shape or form, ‘secret articles’ notwithstanding.
Any more than it applies to Bermuda.
Try reading slowly whilst concentrating and take notes to remind you what you have just read, then get a grownup/carer to check you have actually understood what you have read.
Try not to drool on your notes.
.. -.. .. --- - / .-- .- -. -.- . .-. ,
San Lorenzo works against Argentina:
Oct 01st, 2021 - 10:57 pm - Link - Report abuse -1“... an extra secret article removed the restriction on new establishments if any other power did make an establishment south of ”the parts of those coasts already occupied“ by Spain. In the late 1820s, Argentina did in fact form an establishment at Port Louis in the Falklands, south of coastal areas already occupied by Spain in 1790. By a strict interpretation of the Nootka Sound Convention, Britain therefore became entitled to form an establishment in the Falklands as soon as Argentina had become established there.
Argentine historian Diego Luis Molinari believes that the secret clause in the Nootka Sound Convention was specifically put in by Britain with the Falklands in mind, and that Britain's reassertion of sovereignty in 1833 ... ...was an exercise of Britain's rights under this clause. In the opinion of Professor Dolzer, the Nootka Sound Convention was a purely bipartite agreement between Britain and Spain, which means that Argentina could not benefit from its provisions in any way. ...”
Getting it right: the real history of the Falklands/Malvinas by Graham Pascoe and Peter Pepper
Terry F*uckwitt
Oct 02nd, 2021 - 02:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Ahhhhh, at last a real answer, even it is not your own work, a relevant copy/paste no less, a first for you, congratulations you see what you can do when you try, well done.
‘the Nootka Sound Convention was a purely bipartite agreement between Britain and Spain, which means that Argentina could not benefit from its provisions in any way’.
Neither can they suffer from them in any way.
It is irrelevant as far as the Falklands concerned.
As to the secret article ‘no establishment shall have been formed by the subjects of any other power on the coasts in question’, if the ‘coasts in question’ are defined the same as in article VI, then that would put the Falklands outside the terms of the secret article as well.
The fact remains that in 1790 the Falklands were an existing settlement on Islands not adjacent to a coast occupied by Spain.
Perhaps Britain and Spain were both planning to invade Tierra del Fuego???
The Nootka Sound Convention is and always has been irrelevant as far as the Falklands are concerned.
Now let’s see if you can keep it up.
addendum
Oct 02nd, 2021 - 03:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0According to Wikisource, wonder if anyone is doing time for leaking this info???
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nootka_Sound_Convention
‘ARTICLE VI
It is further agreed with respect to the eastern and western coasts of South America and the islands adjacent, that the respective subjects shall not form in the future any establishment on the parts of the coast situated to the south of the parts of the same coast and of the islands adjacent already occupied by Spain;…’
So, no new ‘establishments’ on parts of the coast, (and only the coasts are mentioned here) south of the coasts and islands adjacent already occupied by Spain.
Doesn’t cover any islands, other than one adjacent to coasts already occupied by Spain.
‘SECRET ARTICLE
Since by article 6 of the present convention it has been stipulated, respecting the eastern and western coasts of South America, that the respective subjects shall not in the future form any establishment on the parts of these coasts situated to the south of the parts of the said coasts actually occupied by Spain, it is agreed and declared by the present article that this stipulation shall remain in force only so long as no establishment shall have been formed by the subjects of any other power on the coasts in question. This secret article shall have the same force as if it were inserted in the convention.’
Again, only talks about new establishments on the coasts, no mention of Islands at all.
If this is an accurate version of what the treaty says, then it does not apply to the Falklands.
If.
Your opinion or the experts that I have proffered, no contest.
Oct 02nd, 2021 - 04:18 pm - Link - Report abuse -1”No repetition of the “bags of soiled Bumf in Brazil”
No just a reminder of your participation in the scheme of things, as a clagnut.
“Don’t see any evidence supporting any of these assertions”
“If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, it must be a duck”
It’s alright Pugol the enabler of the narcistic fascist, will undoubtedly be along as an Argentine apologist for a third time.
He’s still doing it here.
“Pugol was able to pass gas at will and at varying pitch, thereby playing tunes for sold-out shows at the Moulin Rouge of 'Paris'. production.”
https://www.joyfulbelly.com/Ayurveda/symptom/Gas-irregular-digestion/558
Terry F*uckwitt
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 12:29 am - Link - Report abuse 0Oh dear, a bit upset are we and just when you were doing so well.
Normal service is resumed, not an answer in sight to the points raised, marvellous.
No logical or reasoned argument to put forward, so you resort to personal attack, hold on, wait a minute, wasn’t there a quote about that you used to copy/paste???
Quack, quack, ah ha, the Duck of Taunton lives again!!!
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5szx9r
And do reconsider about the ‘bags of soiled Bumf in Brazil’, such a favourite, made you look such a TiT.
Just like:
‘When you are bizarrely so outrageous, and indicate you are consuming alcohol’
‘I am here to give those who engage in inappropriate behaviour, their justly deserved comeuppance’
‘My thoughts are based on irrefutable facts’
And the immortal:
‘Charles William Day, The Maxims, Experiences, and Observations of Agogos’
Not forgetting:
‘Servile, subservient, fawning, obsequious, sycophantic, excessively deferential, toadying, ingratiating, unctuous, grovelling, cringing, toadyish, sycophantish, abject, craven, humble, Uriah Heepish, self-abasing; informal slimy, bootlicking, sucky, soapy, forelock-tugging, brown-nosing, apple-polishing, arse-licking, bum-sucking; kiss-ass, ass-kissing, suckholing, unoriginal, uninspired, unimaginative, uninventive, non-innovative, imitative, derivative, creeping Jesus’
Oh, and sorry Argentina.
.. -.. .. --- - / .-- .- -. -.- . .-. ,
‘Charles William Day, The Maxims, Experiences, and Observations of Agogos’
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 09:04 am - Link - Report abuse -1“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery that mediocrity can pay to greatness.” Oscar Wilde
“Almost all absurdity of conduct arises from the imitation of those who we cannot resemble” Samuel Johnson
But then you have revealed to your lack of moral character by becoming an enabler for a malignant narcissist, and an Argentine apologist. With riding on others coat-tails, you have realized your goal as a clagnut.
It’s sad that during this beautiful day in the glorious Aconcagua Valley — I need to address this — but harmful comments are detrimental to this forum’s purpose.
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 02:16 pm - Link - Report abuse -1It is entirely obvious that the entire Falklands issue was created to divert the Argentine public away from the serious economic corruption away from what was one of the wealthiest countries in the World!
Argentina should have been one of the greatest economies in the World — but due to an ingrained trait of corruption the once great country is a disaster.
(We see the same thing happening in Venezuela where they have more petroleum reserves than Saudi Arabia yet blame their complete disaster on the North Americans!)
Meanwhile — manners maketh man and certainly the pseudonym “Terence” is NOT a gentleman!
Four contributors to the MercoPress forum have reached the same conclusion that the user name “Terence Hill” is a malicious and mendacious troll.
Terence has stolen the valor of an RAF veteran of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis — but in fact has been exposed as Skippy Jessop who was born in 1977 in Utah.
The actual identity of Terence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBBrSSyp7_M
As far as ourselves — we are enjoying the countryside and the good health of our family — life is wonderful if you embrace the importance of ATTITUDE is EVERYTHING!
¡Saludos cordiales desde Panquehue!
“Manners maketh …”
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 02:50 pm - Link - Report abuse -1You certainly got a nerve, as you don’t practice in the least what you preach.
“An assertion is a statement offered as a conclusion without supporting evidence. Since an argument is defined as a logical relationship between premise and conclusion, a simple assertion is not an argument.”
Ignoring the Burden of Proof http ://learn.lexiconic.net/fallacies/index.htm
“burden of proof lies upon him who affirms, not on him who denies, (since by the nature of things, he who denies a fact cannot produce any proof). The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him. Upon the one alleging, not upon him denying, rests the duty of proving.”
Soma's Dictionary of Latin Quotations, Maxims and Phrases: A Compendium of ..
“THE MALIGNANT PERSONALITY: These people are mentally ill and extremely dangerous! The following precautions will help to protect you from the destructive acts of which they are capable. To recognize them, keep the following guidelines in mind:
(1) They are habitual liars. They seem incapable of either knowing or telling the truth about anything.
(2) They are egotistical to the point of narcissism. They really believe they are set apart from the rest of humanity by some special grace.
(3) They scapegoat; they are incapable of either having the insight or willingness to accept responsibility for anything they do. Whatever the problem, it is always someone else’s fault.
(4) They are remorselessly vindictive when thwarted or exposed.
(5) Genuine religious, moral, or other values play no part in their lives. They have no empathy for others and are capable of violence. Under older psychological terminology, they fall into the category of psychopath or sociopath …”
https://truthlover5.com/2012/12/07/profile-of-a-sociopath-charming-manipulative-grandiose-lying-narcissitic-authoritarian-secretive/
Everyone appreciates the very special diatribe from Skippy — a self declared psychological expert of boredom.
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 06:00 pm - Link - Report abuse -1He’s also apparently a legal expert — although he has lost two very quarrelsome embarrassing lawsuits against transsexuals.
He has an infamous televised humorous history: https://youtu.be/i3yGojjbW-Q
“Terence” will soon now show us his ridiculously silly beer mug fraud — but in truth many of us have learned his actual identity.
¡Saludos cordiales desde Panquehue!
I can’t speak for Skippy, and neither can you.
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 08:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0“Many of us have learned his actual identity. …” which you fail to prove.
“Burden of proof lies upon him who affirms, not on him who denies, (since by the nature of things, he who denies a fact cannot produce any proof). The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him. Upon the one alleging, not upon him denying, rests the duty of proving.”
Soma's Dictionary of Latin Quotations, Maxims and Phrases: A Compendium of ..
“His ridiculously silly … fraud”
Whereas to my identity https://imgur.com/a/WDPeU puts my stamp of truth on the evidence.
While you cannot point to even one post, where you have proved it is true, that’s absolutely remarkable.
”Narcissists are often ill-equipped to have mature discussions or resolve conflicts yet in their mind they are experts at it. As a result, they often use some terms, arguments, or techniques that they've heard about yet don't really understand, all while thinking that they are being rational, reasonable, or correct. Sometimes to the degree that they become extremely upset or even aggressive that you are being irrational, unreasonable, uneducated, and unwilling or unable to have a mature conversation.
Meanwhile in reality, what they're saying is simply an incoherent rant or an amalgamation of logical and argumentation fallacies, misrepresentation of you, factual errors, emotional language, or pure nonsense (as in something that literally makes no sense). In more extreme cases it is called word salad, as in a mix of words that are just thrown together with no coherence or structure.”
https ://psychcentral.com/blog/psychology-self/2018/08/narcissist-arguing#2
P U G O L (ttwh)
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 08:52 pm - Link - Report abuse -1I’m very amused that Skippy Jessop continues to rant that “…Narcissists are often ill-equipped to have mature discussions or resolve conflicts yet in their mind they are experts at it…” proves my point and he completely denies his numerous documented legal problems.
Perhaps he would would to explain his televised court case — which formerly resulted in a judge actually scolding him during his highly embarrassing catfished lawsuit with a transvestite which he ignobly lost in judgement.
The actual “Terence” identity is hilarious: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBBrSSyp7_M
Skippy has been proven not being an octogenarian — in truth — he’s an overweight bachelor still living with his mother in Utah.
Considering the Utah has an abundance of fresh fruit and vegetables currently available in supermarkets there — he should change his diet and certainly address the severe gross obesity problem he suffers.
(Adopting a diet that includes healthy avocados would do wonders for his attitude!)
¡Saludos cordiales desde Valle Nevado!
“The actual “Terence” identity is hilarious ..”
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 09:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You mean your fraudulent proffering of your alter ego as myself.
“Skippy manages to land himself a date.”
My name is conspicuous by its absence, so you have exposed the lying fraud you are.
Malignant Narcissist.
A special sub-type of narcissist that has also some traits of ASPD, such as aggressiveness, deceitfulness, and remorselessness. They are often sadistic and gain pleasure from hurting others.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
A type of personality disorder in which a person has grandiose fantasies of success and power with few or no achievements behind the fantasies. … they are unique and entitled to special treatment, admiration, and obedience.
Psychopath/Sociopath.
Considered to be sub-types of ASPD where the criteria must include disregard of laws and norms.. Only the term “psychopath” has been recognized in the DSM-5, and it is not an official diagnosis. Some researchers believe that there are differences between the two in how they behave. For example, they believe that a psychopath is more calculating and a sociopath acts more spontaneously. The main features that both terms share that are relevant to narcissistic abuse are the lack of a conscience or remorse and the ability to manipulate and deceive.”
https://fairytaleshadows.com/narcissist-dictionary-terms/
“Adopting a diet that includes healthy avocados would do wonders ..”
Why! Your still full of shit.
P U G O L (ttwh)
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 10:00 pm - Link - Report abuse -1Pity your South American compadre as we are planning our evening’s fare of Blanquette de Veau (a delicious creamy veal stew made with butter, cream and brandy) served with freshly baked sourdough baguettes accompanied with a wonderful ‘15 Viña Arboleda Carménère.
I’m highly amused that Skippy Jessop still denies his real identity and wants to deny the existence of his YouTube channel. (I seem to have touched his nerves…)
This last video was published for Valentine’s Day this year and it’s obvious he needs to embrace the truth about himself. (Pretending to be an octogenarian RAF veteran of the 1962 Cuba Missile Crisis is criminally delusional.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wwXxhVN4Mw&t=45s
You’ll note that due to his abuse of imbibing Popov brand vodka — drinking has left him with a serious nervous tremor causing his apparent uncontrollable shaking — visible in his most recent videos.
As I’ve mentioned earlier — perhaps bariatric surgery may be a prudent option — as his health has visibly deteriorated since the photographs in 2016.
As always, all my very best regards from Panquehue!
“I’m highly amused that Skippy Jessop still denies his real identity”
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 10:23 pm - Link - Report abuse -1That’s pretty remarkable considering you were exposed as a liar on my last post.
“Internet trolls have a mental disorder
An Internet troll is someone who joins an online discussion and posts comments designed to upset or disrupt the conversation. Often, it is quickly evident that their sole purpose is to upset everyone. They will lie, exaggerate, defame and vituperate just to create a response and derail a thread.
Some researchers from Canada sought to find out what type of person would do this and why. Their study, published in the September 2014 issue of Personality and Individual Differences, found that cybertrolling was an Internet manifestation of everyday sadism.
The study authors wrote that the Dark Tetrad scores were off the charts for Internet trolls and “… the associations between sadism and GAIT (Global Assessment of Internet Trolling) scores were so strong that it might be said that online trolls are prototypical everyday sadists.”
https://personalliberty.com/internet-trolls-have-a-mental-disorder/
Terry F*uckwitt
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 10:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Ok, I’ll post the link, Terry F*uckwitt’s finest hour.
Enjoy people:
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/10/17/brazilian-senator-close-ally-of-bolsonaro-forced-to-resign-over-hidden-cash/comments#comment512332
Oh, and sorry Argentina.
.. -.. .. --- - / .-- .- -. -.- . .-. ,
“Finest hour.” It certainly decided the truth of issue, and showed JB was liar. Thanks for showing another of my winning arguments, perpetual loser dingleberry.
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 10:39 pm - Link - Report abuse -1P U G O L ttwh
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 10:46 pm - Link - Report abuse -1Unfortunately Skippy has difficulty understanding that he’s been fully exposed!
I regret Jack is not present to see this spectacle of Skippy’s mental breakdown, but I really appreciate your early insight to understand and reveal his actual embarrassing personality.
Jack of course identified Skippy’s illicit relationship with Long Dong Silver and it was obvious he had never visited Brazil — much less serving in the RAF as a qualified airman.
His envy and jealousy mirror what we see on his YouTube channel — which is pathetic!
Many of our guests departed after a lovely mid-day luncheon and it has been amusing to wind up the mechanical monkey one more time — to again watch him madly clang it’s tiny cymbals in fury quoting his psychotic delusions…
An actual verified image: https://youtu.be/lXKesQCjq-w
…proving he’s so really humorously pathetic…
¡Saludos cordiales desde Valle Nevado!
Unfortunately you have difficulty understanding that your muse is not here, and neither are you all here.
Oct 03rd, 2021 - 11:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0THE MALIGNANT PERSONALITY: These people are mentally ill and extremely dangerous! The following precautions will help to protect you from the destructive acts of which they are capable. To recognize them, keep the following guidelines in mind:
(1) They are habitual liars. They seem incapable of either knowing or telling the truth about anything.
(2) They are egotistical to the point of narcissism. They really believe they are set apart from the rest of humanity by some special grace.
(3) They scapegoat; they are incapable of either having the insight or willingness to accept responsibility for anything they do. Whatever the problem, it is always someone else’s fault.
(4) They are remorselessly vindictive when thwarted or exposed.
(5) Genuine religious, moral, or other values play no part in their lives. They have no empathy for others and are capable of violence. Under older psychological terminology, they fall into the category of psychopath or sociopath, but unlike the typical psychopath, their behavior is masked by a superficial social facade.
https://truthlover5.com/2012/12/07/profile-of-a-sociopath-charming-manipulative-grandiose-lying-narcissitic-authoritarian-secretive/
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!