MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, October 21st 2020 - 05:28 UTC

 

 

Brazilian Senator, close ally of Bolsonaro forced to resign over hidden cash

Saturday, October 17th 2020 - 08:36 UTC
Full article 19 comments

Brazilian lawmaker Chico Rodrigues was forced to resign on Thursday from the Senate after police found cash hidden in his underwear during a search of his home. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Terence Hill

    They found the fecal stained money stuck in his anus.

    Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Brasileiro

    Money laundering is required. kkkk

    Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Jack Bauer

    Right on F*ckwitt.....that's something you should understand.

    Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Jack Bauer aka Proof-less and Truth-less
    Your lying versus my proof, as previously shown.
    JB “So, easily proven that anyone can purchase such a mug”. Then why haven't you shown where?
    “No. 18 Squadron - Valiant equipped C Flight of 199 Squadron renumbered 18 Squadron at Finningley on 17 December 1958 and disbanded 31 March 1963.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_Valiant
    Oh dear you're proved a liar again, but no surprise, just as typical as in the following:
    JB “Your insistence that I'm a fascist”
    Brazil's corruption scandals reach Lula da Silva: ...
    12 Jack Bauer; “..'Military dictatorship', ..history is showing,.. that it was good for Brazil
    50 Jack Bauer; “Military taking over again, ….. they did it to prevent Brazil from being handed over to the communists. ... the Military , I hope, would be there again to save Brazil
    http ://en.mercopress.com/2015/01/26/brazil-supportive-of-mercosur-as-long-as-it-does-not-turn-into-a-burden/comments#comment378210
    Brazil remembers the 50th anniversary of the coupe …
    15 Jack Bauer; “..Am pretty sure that military are accompanying all this … I hope they DO take over...”

    Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pugol-H

    Tel
    Then why can’t you post a picture of “said Tankard” with a today’s newspaper, to prove you have the Tankard and not just a picture of someone else’s, eh, so simple.

    “The “burden of proof” lies with the individual making the claim”, your words Tel, your very own words, how do they taste?

    No proof, no truth Tel, game, set and match to me, I win again.

    Shine on Tel, shine on.

    ¡Saludos!

    Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Pugol, the ingratiator camp follower, four-time loser.
    “Not just a picture of someone else’s” You must think I'm as stupid as you are? The picture includes the following verification. My name, my military unit, and the date. So why don't you produce evidence to rebut those facts or STFU.
    Further more, I don't jump through hoops for a coat-tail riding, four-time loser.

    Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Pugol-H

    Tel
    I think, you are as thick as Pig Shit, Tel, to be quite honest.

    The “burden of proof” lies with the individual making the claim”, your words Tel, your very own words, how do they taste? Swallow now Tel, swallow.

    Jump Tel, Jump, the hoop is there, or, you are proved a liar and a fraud.

    For all to see!

    No proof, no truth Tel, game, set and match to me, I win again.

    Shine on Tel, shine on.

    ¡Saludos!

    Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Pugol, the ingratiator camp follower, four-time loser.
    “Or, you are proved a liar and a fraud.” On contrary, once again. Your claim is redundant under the criteria of burden of proof since that permits you to fallaciously shift the burden of proof from yourself, that needs justification, then demand that I, as your opponent justify the opposite of the claim. ”The opponent has no such burden until evidence is presented for the claim.“ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/states-of-affairs/
    The picture includes the following verification. My name, my military unit, and the date. So why don't you produce evidence to rebut those facts or STFU.
    No proof, no truth.

    Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse -2
  • Pugol-H

    Tel
    “Personal attacks” again Tel, a beaten man’s last resort, insults.

    You are the one claiming you have the Tankard, not just a photo of someone else’s that you have posted.

    You also claimed that you took the photo and posted it within 30 mins of being challenged about your “claimed military service” and therefore it could not have been fake, as there was not enough time.

    And you have consistently refuse to provide any evidence to support your claims, such as a picture of “said Tankard” with a today’s newspaper.

    So, a liar and a fraud it is then Tel, for all to see!

    No proof, no truth Tel, game, set and match to me, I win again.

    Shine on Tel, shine on.

    ¡Saludos!

    Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Terence Hill

    Pugol, the ingratiator camp follower, four-time loser.
    “Personal attacks again” O contraire, I have just shown just the facts that refute your personal and fallacious attacks.
    ”Refuse to provide any evidence to support your claims, such as a picture of “said Tankard” with a today’s newspaper.” That's right, I only have to prove once, which I have done, the problem is you can't refute it.
    The picture includes the following verification. My name, my military unit, and the date. So why don't you produce evidence to rebut those facts or STFU.
    No proof, no truth.

    Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Jack Bauer

    Pugol-H

    Now the F*ckwitt has really got his knickers in a twist.....the ones he has soiled many a time.
    Every time his dear old Ma throws them in the garbage, his Pinocchio nose always sniffs them out and he salvages them.

    Every time he loses a discussion (and control over his bowels) - which is just about always - he resorts to personal attacks, silly quotes in Latin (which he doesn't have a clue to what they mean) and French phrases (such as “au contraire”, which he can't even spell properly....not to mention the mess he managed to make of the expression in English, as well...“on contrary”....just trying to help...

    As to the infamous tankard, he can't prove anything.....

    “JB “So, easily proven that anyone can purchase such a mug”. Then why haven't you shown where?”......I have...on eBay....dozens of options.

    Perhaps he should just post a photo the bill from the souvenitr shop at which he, or his dear old Ma, purchased it, and admit, once and for all that he is a compulsive liar.

    While you and me only point out the bare facts, the F*ckwitt always loses his temper and allows his potty-mouth get the better of him....Sad.

    Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Jack Bauer aka Proof-less and Truth-less
    “As to the infamous tankard, he can't prove anything....” Already have, and shown you for the liar you are, four posts ago.
    “No. 18 Squadron - Valiant equipped C Flight of 199 Squadron renumbered 18 Squadron at Finningley on 17 December 1958 and disbanded 31 March 1963.”
    https ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_Valiant
    The picture includes the following verification. My name, my military unit, and the date.
    https://imgur.com/a/WDPeU
    “A picture's worth a thousand words”
    https ://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_picture_is_worth_a_thousand_words
    No proof, no truth.

    Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Jack Bauer

    F*ckwitt, aka Terence A.Hole, aka Gollum, aka Thick as Pigsh*t

    What you produced 'four posts ago', and nothing, are the same.

    Sure, 'a 'picture is worth 1,000 words', but in your case it just proves you have appropriated a photo of some tankard and claim it was awarded to you for cleaning lavatories, leaving them as spotless as your reputation......afraid that ain't gonna cut it.
    Try again Numb Nuts...

    When you reply to this, as you most certainly will, please don't forget to mention how I supported the military after 1964......and how I hoped they would get rid of Dilma...which wasn't necessary, as “we, the people”, got rid of her.
    On the other hand, if you manage to resist the temptation of replying, no need to feel frustrated, I know you really wanted to.

    Posted 13 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pugol-H

    Tel
    Just in case you missed it, I’ll repeat it for you, Coz I’m good like that:

    “Every time he loses a discussion (and control over his bowels) - which is just about always - he resorts to personal attacks, silly quotes in Latin (which he doesn't have a clue to what they mean) and French phrases (such as “au contraire”, which he can't even spell properly....not to mention the mess he managed to make of the expression in English, as well...“on contrary”....just trying to help...

    As to the infamous tankard, he can't prove anything.....”

    You’re dealing with educated people here Tel, which unfortunately for you shows up just how “Pig Shit Thick” you really are.

    No proof, no truth Tel, JB wins again.

    Shine on Tel, shine on.

    JB
    Could not have put it better myself, spot on.

    Posted 12 hours ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Terence Hill

    Jack Bauer aka Proof-less and Truth-less
    “Proves you have appropriated a photo of some tankard and claim it was awarded to you”
    The image includes the following verification. My name, my military unit, and the date.
    https://imgur.com/a/WDPeU. Which makes a liar out you again.
    Pugol, the ingratiator camp follower, five-time loser.
    “Personal attacks again” O contraire, I have shown just the facts that refute your personal and fallacious attacks.
    “An assertion is a statement offered as a conclusion without supporting evidence. Since an argument is defined as a logical relationship between premise and conclusion, a simple assertion is not an argument.”
    Ignoring the Burden of Proof http ://learn.lexiconic.net/fallacies/index.htm
    ”Refuse to provide any evidence to support your claims, such as a picture of “said Tankard” with a today’s newspaper.” That's right, I only have to prove once, which I have done, the problem is you can't refute it.
    So you have proved ad nauseam, ad tedium, that you are nothing but an ineffective flamer.
    So now you are a 'five-time loser', as you have failed to meet your burden of proof, in any of your preceding posts.
    So why don't you produce evidence to rebut those facts or STFU?
    No proof, no truth.

    Posted 12 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    Dear F*CKWITT,

    May I give you a word of advice ?

    Don't bother insisting ....NO ONE believes you....not even your dear old Ma....well, not entirely correct, perhaps your dolls do, as they at least, never contradict you.....

    “So why don't you produce evidence to rebut those facts or STFU?”....

    Now, now......don't get upset......some people are born to clean bogs....no good for anything else.

    Pugol-H

    The F*ckwitt must have pooped his pants, just like our Senator....who, btw, is now claiming he only wanted to hide the money - up his anus ???- because it was going to be used to pay his employees, and he was afraid it might be stolen....well, if I were one of his employees, I wouldn't want to get paid with cash covered in poop...to hear the idiot trying to explain his actions is hilarious...corrupt SOB..

    Posted 10 hours ago - Link - Report abuse -1
  • Terence Hill

    Jack Bauer aka Proof-less and Truth-less
    “NO ONE believes you....” Says a revealed liar.
    I don't rely on such subjective mores, I place my reliance on legal proofs and practices.
    “Some people are born” Well I can prove what did in the RAF, as I acquired a memorabilia tankard from 18 Sqn.
    Whereas the only service that provides, and maintains field toilets is the Army Pioneer Corp. So you're the only person here, that could have possibly been engaged in such employment. As they don't have such a trade in the RAF.
    “The Valiant element subsequently acquired sole title to the squadron numberplate before moving to Finningley in 1958 where it was promptly renumbered as No 18 Sqn.”
    https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/Research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-28-Seminar-Electronic-Warfare.pdf
    Pugol, the ingratiator camp follower, five-time loser.
    “He resorts to personal attacks” Which you fail to prove, no proof, no truth
    “Which he can't even spell” “Equity regards substance rather than form.”
    Those that lose the argument and are left with only personal attacks, are called 'losers.'
    ”It used to be we thought that people who went around correcting other people's grammar were just plain annoying. Now there's evidence they are actually ill, suffering from a type of obsessive-compulsive disorder/oppositional defiant disorder (OCD/ODD). Researchers are calling it Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome, or GPS.“ illinois.edu/blog/view/25/76120
    ”Grammar Pedantry Syndrome“ is a form of OCD in which sufferers need to correct every grammatical error.”

    Posted 10 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    F*ckwitt, aka Thick as P-----t (fill in the blanks)

    I asked you to post your usual rants about my support of the military in '64, not to try to promote yourself....from a bog cleaner, to what exactly ? ah, nothing....any normal person would be ashamed if they were caught lying publicly about their achievements.....you know, something to do with stolen valour... fake career, fake tankard....

    But as I said, please don't get pissed off at me....I was just trying to help you feel less of a failure. If Goebbels had ever met you, he would have made you his right hand bum-sucker.

    Posted 8 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Jack Bauer aka Proof-less and Truth-less
    “Not to try to promote yourself” The only service that provides, and maintains field toilets is the Army Pioneer Corp. So you're the only person here that was in the army, that could have possibly been engaged in such employment. As they don't have such a trade in the RAF.
    The gear I was responsible for was:
    1 × AN/APR-4
    1 × AN/APR-9
    6 × AN/APT-16
    3 × AN/ALT-7
    6 × AIRBORNE CIGAR 1 × CARPET 4 WINDOW

    Wide (38-1000MHz) band receiver Wide (1000-10750MHz) band receiver Centimetric radar jammers
    UHF comms jammers
    VHF comms jammers
    Spot jammer (400-1400 MHz)
    Fig 6. Typical EW Fit in No 18 Sqn’s Valiants.
    https://www.rafmuseum.org.uk/documents/Research/RAF-Historical-Society-Journals/Journal-28-Seminar-Electronic-Warfare.pdf. p67
    You must have hated being in the Pioneer Corp as it's all you try to project onto others. Just another Pongo loser.

    Posted 4 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0

Please log in or register (it’s free!) to comment.