US President Donald Trump insisted on Friday that his administration needed to take effective control of Greenland because otherwise Moscow or Beijing would do it. By hook or by crook, Washington needs to prevent it from falling under the influence of Russia or China, Trump explained to reporters at the White House. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesThere is a problem. Trump cannot be seen to back down if he is to retain support amongst his MAGA voting base. Most of Europe has declared annexation of Greenland by another state as a hostile act and a potential red-line. It may pay to declare the existing US. facility as U.S. Sovereign Base Territory, and allow them (the U.S.) to develop additional support facilities as required. I believe this would likely avert invasion, but would still cause fracture lines in NATO, which will encourage Putin.
Posted 22 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0The UK needs at least 4 years to regain a modicum of military capability. Likewise Europe. so we are playing for time here as we face this new threat from the West. Unsettling times for us all.
The hubris is beyond belief. The US once offered to purchase the Danish caribbean islands (Virgin Islands), but the offer was rejected at first, but eventually negotiated as part of WW1 geopolitical moves. Under the Treaty of the Danish West Indies the US acknowledged Danish control of Greenland and now the US acts to abrogate our contract and ignore the will and wishes of the resident population, akin to the treatment of the Chagossians of Diego Garcia. I am currently with visitors from Iceland and they report extreme alarm regarding this posturing and they declare that the very existence of NATO is indeed in peril. A unilateral, especially martial, takeover may very well result in a significant degradation of US North Atlantic security in the long term.
Posted 21 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0Even if they can ‘do a deal’ over this, Europe and Canada now know exactly what they are dealing with in Trump and that the NATO treaty isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.
Posted 17 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0The US is rapidly turning friends into countries hostile to the US, which won’t bother Trump but will affect the US going forward, isolation always has a cost.
Veteran
Agreed, this is now about buying time whilst rebuilding military capabilities, without using any new US kit. We are in a new reality, a post Pax Americana world.
Trump again using lies to justify his actions, if he goes the hard way it will probably result in the end of Nato or at least a much reduced Nato
Posted 15 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0https://youtu.be/2zpECHwNiJw?si=erwm-ok8wv-aUKpu
Please log in or register (it’s free!) to comment. Login with Facebook