The dispute comes as Trump heads into the World Economic Forum in Davos US President Donald Trump reignited tensions with European allies on Monday by linking his push for control of Greenland to the Nobel Peace Prize — arguing that, because he did not receive the award, he no longer feels “obliged to think only about peace.” In a message addressed to Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre —later circulated to European embassies in Washington— Trump pivoted from the Nobel grievance to Greenland, saying the world would not be safe without “total and absolute” US control of the Arctic island.
Støre confirmed the authenticity of the message and reiterated Norway’s support for Denmark on Greenland’s sovereignty, stressing that the Nobel Peace Prize is decided by an independent committee, not by the Norwegian government.
In the letter, Trump challenges Denmark’s claim to Greenland and argues Copenhagen cannot protect the territory from Russia and China. “The world is not safe until we have total and absolute control over Greenland,” he wrote, according to the transcript reported by US outlets.
The dispute comes as Trump heads into the World Economic Forum in Davos. The World Economic Forum’s official programme lists a “Special Address” by the US president on Wednesday, 21 January. This year’s gathering—bringing together thousands of political leaders and corporate executives—has been framed by expectations of US positions on trade, security and transatlantic alliances, according to an AP preview of the summit.
Pressure on Denmark and Europe’s response
Beyond the Norway exchange, Greenland has triggered renewed diplomatic coordination in Europe. Denmark has indicated it will work with allies on a response should the United States move further toward more forceful measures regarding the territory, Reuters reported.
The argument sits within a broader Arctic security debate involving sea routes, surveillance and military posture. The United States has long held strategic presence in Greenland—including the Pituffik base—under arrangements with Denmark, a point often raised by critics who argue Washington can expand capabilities through cooperation without needing “ownership.”
Trump, however, has framed Greenland as a national security necessity and has claimed NATO “should do something” for the United States, presenting the issue as part of alliance burden-sharing. Across Europe, the rhetoric has prompted political pushback and public protests, particularly in Denmark and parts of the Nordic region, according to international coverage.
Nobel, Venezuela, and the political backdrop
The Nobel angle also intersects with Venezuela: the Nobel Committee awarded the most recent prize to opposition leader María Corina Machado—an outcome Trump references in his complaint, as reported by AP. European observers note Trump’s repeated use of symbolic gestures and direct messages to leaders as a pressure tactic—now with Davos serving as an immediate global stage.
In practical terms, the message to Støre adds uncertainty about Washington’s Arctic intentions at a moment when several European governments are trying to avoid an open crisis within NATO. Norway’s response—underscoring the Nobel committee’s independence while backing Danish sovereignty—seeks to de-escalate without conceding the core question: whether Greenland remains a self-governing territory under the Danish crown, or becomes subject to US control through political leverage or coercion.
With Trump set to speak in Davos, the Greenland dispute is no longer a side provocation. It is becoming an early test of how the White House intends to renegotiate—publicly—the boundaries of the transatlantic relationship.
Top Comments
Disclaimer & comment rules-

Veteran
-

MarkWhelan
-

Shogun
Read all commentsNATO should do something for the United States Trump.
Jan 20th, 2026 - 11:32 am 0NATO invoked Article 5 for the United States after 9/11: The only time this has happened since NATO was formed in 1949.
NATO forces fought terrorists alongside the United States and plucky Denmark lost more soldiers killed on a per-capita basis then any other country in the Alliance.
The feeling here in the UK, is that Trump is losing it. Worrying times.
The World Economic Forum would be the perfect place for other nations and top business executives to 'let the world be heard'.
Jan 20th, 2026 - 01:20 pm 0The Special Address” by the US president on Wednesday, 21 January. would be the perfect time for the invited guests to do a mass walkout. This could be followed by a presentation of a dummy (baby pacifier) to Trump on his departure from the room.
Many may find this hard to believe, but Its not Trump but the deep state strategists of the US
Jan 21st, 2026 - 12:15 am 0Why ?
NATO and Europe has always been looked upon as a shield against the so called Russian threat from a US view point
But they have come to realise that Europe is no longer any use to them as shown by the Ukraine war. Due to their over reliance on the US they no longer have a viable military not one of them accept for Turkey if they are considered part of Europe and they are a NATO member
Add to that Europe has run down its industrial base and can not supply Ukraine with what it needs in the form of weapons etc.To recover will take decades and thriving economies.
They hve a massive gas supply problem for now and the future, no longer taking russian gas they are completely dependent on LPG from the US I think about 25% now comes from the US
The USA has them over a barrel if everybody starts dishing out tariffs
So the next best thing take Greenland and they have another land mass or shield
As a side note the USA only has 2 Icebreakess and one of them is out of comission where as the Ruskies have 40 and several of them nuclear powered lol
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!