President Dilma Rousseff continues to enjoy high popularity as Brazilian consumers sound very optimistic about the future of their country and trust they can hold on to their jobs despite the recent economic slowdown. Read full article
#3 Idiots? Most Brazilians? What's remarkable is that a country so big, with such a long history of underdevelopment, unfulfilled potential and extreme povery has now had two Presidents in a row with such stratospheric popularity rates, in a vibrant, even fractured, multi-party democracy that doesn't lend itself to the kind of 99.9% votes that until recently embarassed the elections of the Arab world for example. It must be because their left policies have been successful in unlocking Brazil's potential and have given real reasons for optimism to a population unlikely to be fooled by more of the same. What European leader could get, over a 10 year period, 70% plus, and growing, popularity rates?! Or is that because Europeans are less idiotic? That must be why our economies are doing so well!!!
If 69% would vote for da Silva who presided over the most corrupt government possible, instead of Rousseff, who to her credit has done what she can to get rid of the grafters and correct the stupidity of da Siva's 'policies', then YES, idiots.
I think both Lula and Dilma have approval of around 70%, and won't be running against each other, so I wouldn't see the 69% as anti-Dilma. For what its worth I think it would be most sensible for Dilma to seek a second term, though with Lula eligible too it seems the Brazilians are spoiled for choice =)
Lula has cancer. He thinks he is out of it but read what his surgeon said, it was a bit obvious.
AND, we haven't seen him since his 'I may stand if Dillma doesn't' nonsense. The man has not fully recovered yet, even if it is his fate to do so. Putting unnecessary stress on the body reduces the immune system strength, as he obviously found out.
Your Comment
I wish the United States had as good a leadership and as much internal national unity as Brazil.
It isn't a surprise that 2012 growth isn't matching 2011 because of a global slowdown. The country most to blame for that is Germany because of Her insistance on austerity in time of recession.
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesyour right,
Aug 03rd, 2012 - 10:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0the future is in your hands,
but if you bed the devil,
then expect to get your hands burnt,
your choice , your future , lets hope you make the right choice.
There is one item missing in this report: 69% said that they would vote for Lula da Silva 2014 - if he would run for president!
Aug 04th, 2012 - 05:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0@2
Aug 04th, 2012 - 04:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0No accounting for idiots, is there?
#3 Idiots? Most Brazilians? What's remarkable is that a country so big, with such a long history of underdevelopment, unfulfilled potential and extreme povery has now had two Presidents in a row with such stratospheric popularity rates, in a vibrant, even fractured, multi-party democracy that doesn't lend itself to the kind of 99.9% votes that until recently embarassed the elections of the Arab world for example. It must be because their left policies have been successful in unlocking Brazil's potential and have given real reasons for optimism to a population unlikely to be fooled by more of the same. What European leader could get, over a 10 year period, 70% plus, and growing, popularity rates?! Or is that because Europeans are less idiotic? That must be why our economies are doing so well!!!
Aug 04th, 2012 - 05:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0If 69% would vote for da Silva who presided over the most corrupt government possible, instead of Rousseff, who to her credit has done what she can to get rid of the grafters and correct the stupidity of da Siva's 'policies', then YES, idiots.
Aug 04th, 2012 - 09:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I think both Lula and Dilma have approval of around 70%, and won't be running against each other, so I wouldn't see the 69% as anti-Dilma. For what its worth I think it would be most sensible for Dilma to seek a second term, though with Lula eligible too it seems the Brazilians are spoiled for choice =)
Aug 04th, 2012 - 09:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@6
Aug 05th, 2012 - 12:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Lula has cancer. He thinks he is out of it but read what his surgeon said, it was a bit obvious.
AND, we haven't seen him since his 'I may stand if Dillma doesn't' nonsense. The man has not fully recovered yet, even if it is his fate to do so. Putting unnecessary stress on the body reduces the immune system strength, as he obviously found out.
Your Comment
Aug 06th, 2012 - 01:17 am - Link - Report abuse 0I wish the United States had as good a leadership and as much internal national unity as Brazil.
It isn't a surprise that 2012 growth isn't matching 2011 because of a global slowdown. The country most to blame for that is Germany because of Her insistance on austerity in time of recession.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!