MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, October 1st 2023 - 00:12 UTC



Japan appeals to Thatcher Falklands’ resolve quotes in islands dispute with China

Thursday, February 28th 2013 - 14:06 UTC
Full article 26 comments
PM Abe: Senkakus islands are an inviolable part of Japanese territory and no dispute exists, but door to dialogue with China “is always open”. PM Abe: Senkakus islands are an inviolable part of Japanese territory and no dispute exists, but door to dialogue with China “is always open”.

Japan's prime minister on Thursday quoted comments by former British premier Margaret Thatcher about the Falklands War with Argentina as he spoke about Tokyo's acrimonious islands’ dispute with China.

Shinzo Abe channelled the Iron Lady in a speech to parliament in which he talked about Japan's resolve to defend the islands claimed by Beijing in the East China Sea.

“Our national interests are immutable forever,” Abe told lawmakers. “They aim at making the seas - the foundation of our nation's existence - completely open, free and peaceful.” He added “aggressors should never triumph”.

“Former Prime Minister Thatcher, recalling the Falklands War, said she tried to follow the principle that above all, international law - the fundamental rule for the entire world - must prevail against the use of force,” Abe said.

The comments echo those by Thatcher in her autobiography in which she reflected about the 1982 conflict with Argentina over the ownership of the Falklands. Thatcher sent a task force which recaptured the islands after a 74-day war which left 649 Argentines, 255 Britons and three Falkland Islanders.

While few observers see all-out war between Beijing and Tokyo over the Tokyo-controlled Senkakus, some have raised fears that a mistake or a miscalculation by a low-level commander could trigger a military incident.

In January Japan said a Chinese warship had locked its weapons-targeting radar onto a Japanese frigate and a helicopter in open waters near the islands chain which Beijing claims as the Diayous.

The dispute between Asia's two largest economies intensified in September when Tokyo nationalised three of the islands, in what it said was a mere administrative change of ownership.

In his speech, Abe reiterated his long-held position that the islands are an inviolable part of Japanese territory and that no dispute exists.

He noted that he had proposed the first rise in defence spending for 11 years in the context of repeated incursions by Chinese ships into waters around the islands, whose seabed is believed to harbour valuable mineral reserves.

”(But) the door to dialogue is always open,“ Abe said. ”I will call on (China) to return to the start line - a strategic partnership of mutual benefit that does not get derailed by single issues.“

Abe, fresh from a summit with US President Barack Obama in Washington last week, vowed to strengthen the Japan-US alliance which he described as ”precious“. US admits the islands fall under a US/Japan security pact but Washington is keen to avoid a clash in the economically vital region.

Tokyo is also embroiled in island disputes with South Korea and Russia, while North Korea jangled regional nerves in February with its third nuclear test.

The premier said Tokyo wants to establish a forward-looking partnership with Seoul while trying to sign a peace treaty with Moscow by ”seriously tackling“ their territorial dispute.

The prime minister said he wanted to set up a Japanese version of the US National Security Council and called for a ”national debate” on a possible change in the post-World War II constitution that imposed pacifism on Japan.

Abe has long harboured ambitions of rewriting a document which critics say hampers effective self-defence. Supporters say it is a bulwark against the Japanese militarism that blighted Asia in the last century.

On Thursday Japan scrambled fighter jets to head off a Chinese government plane flying towards disputed islands in the East China Sea, the defence ministry said. It said the Y-12 propeller plane did not enter airspace around the Senkakus.

The aircraft headed back towards China after Japan's military planes became airborne, defence officials said, declining to give further details. The incident came as three Chinese government ships sailed into territorial waters around the islands, Japan's coastguard said.

The three marine surveillance ships entered the 12-nautical-mile territorial zone off Uotsuri Island shortly after 7 am local time, the coastguard said in a statement. It said the trio left the zone after just over two hours.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Britworker

    ??? I don't see any correlation with the Falklands whatsoever, those islands are uninhibited, there has been a settled population of Brits in the Falklands for 180 years and 90 years of that went by without so much of a peep from Argentina.

    Feb 28th, 2013 - 03:27 pm 0
  • Raul

    “Former Prime Minister Thatcher, recalling the Falklands War, said he tried to follow the principle that above all, international law - the fundamental rule for everyone - should prevail against the use of force”, Abe said.

    Contexts are different historical and social processes. The specificity of the Malvinas is that the United Kingdom occupied the islands by force in 1833, expelled the original population and did not allow their return, thus violating the territorial integrity of Argentina. You know that the UK does not comply with international law. Currently in the Falklands conflict, UK betting intimidation and violence. Argentina international law and peace. The most concrete evidence are the resolutions of the UN General Assembly and its decolonization committee.

    Feb 28th, 2013 - 03:39 pm 0
  • Boovis

    Raul, you and your “friends” keep posting about this mythical expulsion of people and never, ever, ever, provide proof that it happened. we can, however provide proof that it didn't. So, please link to this evidence which you have clearly seen, or never post about it again. (I presume you have seen actual evidence, otherwise you wouldn't say such things, right? You aren't that blind to follow things you have seen no evidence of...are you...)?

    Feb 28th, 2013 - 03:52 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!