MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 5th 2024 - 08:34 UTC

 

 

Growing frustration and recriminations in Uruguayan cabinet over economic policy

Monday, April 15th 2013 - 11:36 UTC
Full article 18 comments

Relations inside the Uruguayan cabinet remain tense with some ministers in non-talking terms even when President Jose Mujica cancelled the Monday full ministerial turnout for three specific areas, security, social affairs and production meetings, which function every two weeks. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Britworker

    Well its become quite clear that Mujica has spent his time in office concentrating more on Argentine appeasement, than the economic welfare of his own people.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 12:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    What are you talking about?
    Uruguay has not fared better since... ever!

    Plan Ceibal, social programs, legal abortion, gay marriage, reduction of poverty, local production, employment...

    What ARE you talking about?

    ;)

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 12:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    @2 What are you talking about? Did you not read the word “economic”? What has Plan Ceibal, abortion, gay marriage to do with the economy?

    And here is the current profile of the Uruguayan economy. http://www.indexmundi.com/uruguay/economy_profile.html . So let's see;
    the GDP - real growth rate is dropping year on year. Let's call it 18% of the population below the poverty line. Unemployment UP. Expenditures higher than revenues. A budget deficit. Industrial production growth rate negative. Current account in debit. Exchange rate headed back up again. And this is GOOD? Must have really been bad in the past. And two halves of government that don't agree! Excellent. And, along the way, your good “friend” argieland still isn't getting those channels dredged. Because it's in ITS interest not to.

    Here's a thought. Are you too close to it? Do you, as we say, not see the wood for the trees?

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 01:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    Throwing money at poor people has never reduced poverty over the long term.
    Why don't these idiots know that by now?
    How stupid are they?

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 02:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Condorito

    Is the guy in the photo Charrúa or Puelche?
    He looks implanted. Cacique K should act on behalf of all Latam against this colonist threat.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 03:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    Not many Charrúas left, Condorito.
    I'll tell you the story.
    Back in 1816 a lot of things happened in the southern cone. Argentina declared independency, the Brazilians were 6 years from doing so. That means a very unstable period in the area.
    In Banda Oriental, declared 1810 and what would finally be Uruguay in 1828, there was war too. Two characters that are very interesting in this regard, are Fructuoso Rivera, caudillo from San José, and general José Artigas, Montevideano.
    Rivera fought under Artigas until 1820, when Rivera joined the Portuguese side that currently occupied la Banda Oriental. That very same year, Artigas was exiled to Paraguay and never saw his birth place ever again. 2 years later, Brazil delcares independency and Rivera joins the Brazilian ranks. During this period, he founds the Colorado party. In 1825, Uruguay declares independency and Rivera switches side again. 1826 he escaped to Santa Fé, he was sough for having switched side, again. When finally gains independency, 1828, he returns. He gathers old friends, Charrúas and Orientales, Uruguayan all, and marches towards Montevideo. 1830 he is elected President.
    1931, in Salsipuedes (literally Get-out-if-you-can) he gathers all Charrúas under the deception that the land is to be shared. He offers them wine to celebrate their victory. When drunk, they kill the men and spread the remaining women and children in order to kill not only their people, but also their culture and their languge. Something he was successful with. He then sent his niece, Bernabé Rivera to kill those who declined to attend the meeting.

    Our prócer is José Artigas. He was another type of man

    Just look at his Escudo Federal

    http://www.chasque.net/vecinet/Escudo_3.jpg

    Look at the scales.
    To the right, a sword. To the left, a bow.
    To the right, a drum. To the left, an arrow.
    The wreath is half laurel, half pitanga.
    And on top of it all, a crown of feathers.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 04:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Condorito

    “Back in 1816 a lot of things happened in the southern cone.”

    They certainly did. And a lot of things happened in the 300 years previously. It is a nice escudo that, a token gesture to the original inhabitants is far better than the open celebration of their subjugation (as per your southern neighbour) - at least we have that in common.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 05:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    That was no token gesture Condorito, that escudo is from before Salsipuedes.
    If that little rat of a shapeshifter wouldn't have had as much charisma as he had lack of balls, Uruguay could've have seen a Charrúa actually play football...

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 05:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Condorito

    8
    Well it is a sad story.
    At least your Artigas got to live out his days in a country that has maintained much of its indigenous culture, language and heritage intact.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 06:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    I can only take comfort in that I've never agreed on Colorado politics. Not then, not now.
    We've lost many battles to the oligarchy in the past, but that particular one, was a costly one.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 06:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ynsere

    Returning to the subject, it seems Mujica's losing control. The real bosses of the Frente Amplio are the Communists, despite their small number of votes.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 08:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    @6
    “Back in 1816 a lot of things happened in the southern cone. Argentina declared independency”

    But Argentina was not formed till 1853??????????????????

    Interesting post though.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 10:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    Argentina declared its independency from Spain 1816, the fact that some military juntas followed, makes it hard to talk about independency.
    One thing is when you declare independency, another is when you gain it.
    Either way, it's not a particular day that does it, it's a process over time.

    Apr 15th, 2013 - 10:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • redpoll

    Stevie aka Guss,the Denmark skulker
    Yes Rivera was a turncoat and should not be honoured in our country
    Before you condemn the Colorados as oligarchs
    it was old Pepe Battle who introduced the welfare state to Uruguay on the back of the wool boom. Teachers were retiring on full pension at 28 years old at that time

    Apr 16th, 2013 - 12:46 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    Old Battle y Ordoñez... yes, good man. Another Colorado worth mentioning would be José Pedro Varela.

    But that's also it, isn't it?

    Apr 16th, 2013 - 01:09 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • MagnusMaster

    @12. Argentina declared independence in 1816. But then there was war between the provinces and Buenos Aires as there was no agreement on whether the country should be federal or not (the provinces wanted a federal country, Buenos Aires didn't so they could keep ALL the revenues from the port). During that time, each of the provinces was its own independent country. The Constitution was signed in 1853 by all provinces except Buenos Aires, which joined Argentina in 1861 after Buenos Aires was defeated in a war.

    Apr 16th, 2013 - 09:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • redpoll

    16 Magnus perhaps Buenos Aires could be “persuaded” to secede from Argentina? Not many of those who the porteños call provincials have much love for the arrogant people from the current capital of Argentina

    Apr 16th, 2013 - 10:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Stevie

    redpoll
    I take that comment back about José Pedro Varela being Colorado. He wasn't. He merely served under a Colorado regime...

    Apr 17th, 2013 - 12:18 am - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!