MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, November 22nd 2024 - 11:38 UTC

 

 

Exposed C24 chairman agrees to receive Gibraltar's Picardo to match a meeting with Spanish minister

Wednesday, July 15th 2015 - 06:53 UTC
Full article 10 comments

Gibraltar Chief Minister Fabian Picardo is in New York for a meeting with the Chairman of the UN’s Decolonization Committee of 24, ambassador Xavier Lasso Mendoza. The meeting arose from the Chief Minister’s intervention before the C24 last month, during which the Ecuadorian diplomat confirmed he had met with a Spanish government minister to discuss Gibraltar, according or a report from the Gibraltar Chronicle. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Briton

    The outcome of this meeting will be of interest to others,

    it will be interesting what the C24 has to say to defend their existence.

    but interesting all the same.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 09:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ChrisR

    The last dinosaur captured in a photograph, just look at that 'majestic' face above!

    You can ever tell what the dinosaur is thinking 'WTF am I doing here and why is this man berating me and taking the piss out of my beloved C24'

    Way to go Picardo!

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 11:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueror

    Good start for Gibraltar. Fabian Picardo is a lawyer. Lasso Mendoza is a nobody. Should be quite fun to hear Picardo's report of the meeting as Lasso Mendoza is revealed as an argie puppet.

    Britain shouldn't miss such an opportunity. A demand for the permanent members of the Security Council to appoint the members of the C-24. Latam countries to be excluded. The Security Council to determine when a territory has been de-colonised based on specified criteria to be published so that territories know what to achieve. The Security Council also to determine who can attend C-24 meetings. No more latams. No more traitors. One more year to finalise and then C-24 and the Fourth Committee to be abolished.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 01:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • sceptic64

    The key facts here are evidence of the Committee's dereliction of duty.

    They say “we need to see your constitution to assess your status”. They were given it 9 years ago and have not responded.

    Their remit requires them to visit the “colonies” to see things for themselves. The chairman has refused and, when offered a ticket, bluntly stated “You know I won't be using that”.

    The chairman meets secretly with a non-involved and hostile 3rd party who has no role in “decolonisation” (Spain).

    The committee rewrote the statement of last year's meetings to state Spain's case even though they contradicted the minutes of the meeting.

    The committee states that it believes this to be a “territorial dispute”. Well, then it is out of the committee's hands and belongs at the ICJ.

    Mendoza has no role to play, and neither does his fake committee.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 02:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • ChrisR

    @ 4 sceptic64

    Excellent post.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 05:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    This may sound farfetched,
    but I think the UN should pass a resolution that states, that all countries with a dispute must present their case to the ICJ within one year [ 12 months ]

    Or the case is null and void and cannot be resurrected,

    Those placed with the ICJ must comply and accept their decision,

    Surely this resolution along these lines would force countries to defend their claim in court, or lose the right to do so.

    Just an honest thought.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 06:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Pete Bog

    “ Mr. Lasso Mendoza suggested that Mr. Picardo might have used more subtle and insightful language in his address.”

    If Picardo hadn't, then he would have been ignored. After all Picardo was only mimicking the Latino Macho narrative.

    Usually the use of insightful language is ignored by the C24, that's why the rhetoric from the Falklands and Gibraltar now has to be 'in yer face' and straight between the eyes.

    @4 sceptic64

    Right on the nail-the C24 should follow it's remit not it's biased , skewed opinion.

    Jul 15th, 2015 - 10:29 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Phil H

    (6) Briton, good. But some countries would not accept an ICJ Ruling when the decision goes against them. we all know who they are..

    Jul 16th, 2015 - 09:13 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zathras

    I think it is time for the Falkland Islands to play hardball.

    They have repeatedly asked for the C24 to visit.
    They have not.

    A further referendum petitioning the UN to remove them from the Decolonization list and process would force the C24 to take action.

    When the C24 ignores this the UK should take formal steps, maybe via the ICJ to remove the Falklands & South Sandwich islands.

    Jul 16th, 2015 - 12:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Briton

    8 Phil H
    you may well be right,

    but at least from the British point of view, Argentina would lose the argument and support.

    Jul 16th, 2015 - 06:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!