President Dilma Rousseff lost a crucial impeachment vote in Brazil’s lower house on Sunday evening, making her removal ever more likely and deepening the country’s political crisis. Rousseff’s opponents easily obtained the two-thirds majority of votes in the 513-member Chamber of Deputies needed to pass the impeachment measure. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rules1st the Mad Argy Beach.
Apr 18th, 2016 - 06:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Now the Brazillian ex-Terrorist.
It just gets better and better for South America.
I wonder if the Olympics will be ready on time too?
next may be IMF’s Managing Director Christine Lagarde.
Apr 18th, 2016 - 07:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Brazil From frying pan into Fire!
Apr 18th, 2016 - 08:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Irrespective of the fate of the Dilma administration I think that the most important thing is that the investigations and prosecutions against the congress men and women proceed.
Apr 19th, 2016 - 03:21 am - Link - Report abuse 0I want to leave with a photo that adequately explains that the protesters against Dilma are advocating a return to the past when the rich ran everything in Brazil and the poor knew their place:
http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/56e85fea150000ad000b223c.jpeg?cache=ryehtcbzxo
@4
Apr 19th, 2016 - 04:12 am - Link - Report abuse 0Communist
(4) Hepatia
Apr 19th, 2016 - 07:55 am - Link - Report abuse 0Here's a good one from last year's Argentina...
The poor and the rich in perfect harmony fighting for their rights...:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_vCX0RHHfcjE/S-0hUhb0MII/AAAAAAAAASM/o88qyXrDj1Q/s1600/cacerolera+cheta.jpg
@4 Hippy
Apr 19th, 2016 - 03:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0As usual you've got it all wrong....The couple in the photo, that you call 'rich', without any proof of such a statement, should be analysed in realistic terms.....they can and are employing someone who is not as well off as they are - I wonder why ? perhaps because they studied hard to have a decent profession ? maybe the nanny is illiterate and the 'rich' couple was decent enough to employ her, to pay her a salary......and anyway, why is being a nanny, in your view, obviously degrading ? then what have you got to say about garbage men, bus drivers, or other professions that don't require extensive study ? Seems to me that you include yourself in the group that never studied, and which is envious of those who did.....too bad Hippy, go back to school.
Already, the race is on for a Power-Grab and also to see; on which side whose slice is buttered, who butters that side and how much of the butter is being used.
Apr 20th, 2016 - 04:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0@4 Hippy
Apr 20th, 2016 - 09:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Regarding another really stupid, nonsensical remark of yours, ...advocating a return to the past when the rich ran everything in Brazil and the poor knew their place,
I have a question for your super developed brain : What would happen if the poor, in their current standing - mostly without much of an education - were to take over the reigns of government, on all levels, and the rich - despite their higher education - were all sent to do menial jobs ??? What would happen to the country ? I know it's a complicated question for your little brain, and you may have difficulty in visualizing the consequences, but I am perfectly aware that the solution is to educate the poor, but what happens while the poor are still poor and uneducated ? should no-one give them a job, compatible with their limitations ? Is that what YOU are advocating ?
Argentina will be returned to Spain in 25 years...
Just a few of the Privileged Corrupt are enjoying their prison-sentences but a large majority of them is not only free but also are still in command! Please re-vitalize your olfactory senses; if you still can't SMELL A RAT!
Apr 22nd, 2016 - 04:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0:o))
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!