MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, May 18th 2022 - 03:02 UTC

 

 

Rousseff's bid for international support backfiring

Saturday, April 23rd 2016 - 10:51 UTC
Full article 147 comments

Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff from New York accused her political opponents as “coup mongers” and “conspirators” and insisted she would fight to the very end the impeachment process to remove her from office. But her attacks faced a solid defense in Brazil including from members of the Supreme Court who expressed concern the president was questioning Brazil's institutions before the world. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • Lucifer

    the image of Brazil as a dynamic and stable democracy
    ----- that's not the image the rest of the world sees

    Nobody cares about Brazil deal with your own problems or don't it doesn't have any repercussions outside of South America.

    SoAms have such an overinflated ego, they believe their own propoganda, that's why they have such a hard time understanding their true place in the world.
    Ranking of importance is slightly above Africa.
    And nobody cares about Africa.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 11:11 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    1 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    Nobody cares about your explicit racist pronouncements about Brazil, Canada, UK, Africa or any where else. As all they reveal is much about you. “.. research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.”
    http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 11:46 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    aka dumba## I am clearly smarter than you.
    Posting debunked faulty “science” seems to be your speciality.
    It seems you get stuck on a piece of info and carry it right to the grave
    A lot of stupid people do that
    Plus I believe you're Canadian so that very telling.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 12:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    3 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    “Posting debunked” the only possibly is by 'peer review', please keep confirming the tenets of the study. You're the gift that keeps on giving. ” …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.”

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 12:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    I love you tried to prove Canadians were smart and most of the 50 “inventions” were food!

    Priceless.

    Stupid Canuck3

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 12:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    5 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    I guess there's no 'peer review' you can rely on so you just keep reconfirming “ …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.” Moreover. you are so dumb that you have failed to realise that failure to deny my assertion that you are a 'sock-puperteer' confirms this fact.
    ”silence means consent; silent consent is same as expressed consent; consent by conduct is as good as expressed consent. ....”
    SOMA'S DICTIONARY OF LATIN QUOTATIONS MAXIMS AND PHRASES; A Compendium Of Latin Thought And Rhetorical Instruments For The Speaker Author And Legal Practitioner. Well, this Canadian Gordon Hodson, has you nailed 'dead to rights', beautifully irony.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Please clarify, is Poutine one of the “top” 50 “inventions” from Canada?

    Bahahahahaha

    Stupid Canuck3

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    5 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    Moving the 'goal-posts' doesn't help you one iota. You're unable to discredit Hodson's study. “ …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.”
    Since you can't find any support for your claims you're stuck with your own self-imposed limitations. What a lonely little world you inhabit chortle, chortle.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Debunked “science” Stupid Canuck3

    Tell me since you're the one who posted it is Poutine one of Canada's 50 great Inventions?

    G_D Canadians are Stupid.

    If prejudice is truly linked to low cognitive abilities, liberals have proven that they are the ones suffering from the mental deficiencies described in these studies. Their own practices of cultural segregation, race baiting, and constant pandering to divisive groups has exposed their very own brand of prejudice. Furthermore, it's because of their own prejudice that they've failed to understand the true principles of conservatism.
    Believing that conservatism is rooted in prejudice is the result of misinformation. Progressives and liberals have an equal amount of bigotry within their own ranks. Denying this fact is an act of willful ignorance.

    http://www.poletical.com/liberal-liberalism-low-intelligence.php

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:36 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Michael May

    Will Dilma cite the same MERCOSUL democracy clause that was used to admit Chavez' Venezuela into MERCOSUL?

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Terence Hill,

    The USA is a great nation, but in no part is that due to YB/Luci or people like him.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 01:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    9 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    Sorry, 'Liberalism Linked To Low' doesn't meet the prerequisite of 'peer review' since the author Ryan Rados http://www.ryanrados.com has no 'credentials' . Which make his opinion as valid as yours and we all know the true value of yours. Whereas, Gordon Hodson is a bona fide psychologist, so what he states has merit as it is a qualified opinion. Nice try but no cigar, “ …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.”

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:03 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Poutine.

    Stupid Canuck3

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:16 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    13 Lucifer aka yankeebuoy
    Since you have failed to refute my assertion that you are a racist, then it follows that you also suffer from low intelligence. ”silence means consent; silent consent is same as expressed consent; consent by conduct is as good as expressed consent. ....”
    SOMA'S DICTIONARY OF LATIN QUOTATIONS MAXIMS AND PHRASES; A Compendium Of Latin Thought And Rhetorical Instruments For The Speaker Author And Legal Practitioner
    Your post confirms everything I have posted is true , since you're unable to refute it, racist loser. Stupid Canuck if that was true, what does that make you, since I'm running rings round you?
    P.S. Must be heavy futilely lugging those goal posts around, just food for thought. Chortle,chortle.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Show me one racist comment I've ever made.

    We're not in court.

    You think you're running rings around me but that because you're dizzy and daffy.

    Stupid Canuck3

    I have never in my life met a smart Canadian.
    Not once
    Not ever

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marti Llazo

    “ …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with what passes for leadership in letrine america.”

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Hold on a minute, maybe Poutine is one of their great inventions.
    There's not a lot to choose from....

    Stupid Canucks

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 02:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zathras

    “I will fight with all my strength,” she said, adding “I am willing to fight to ensure that Brazil does not become a country where democratic rule is broken”

    The funny things is that impeachment is the democratic way of removing a corupt President.

    Slowly South America is turing away from leftist nutters.
    Eventually they may even enter the 20th Century.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 03:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    The fat cow has lost all sense of proportion....does she really think that appealing to the Mercosul (is it a trade agreement or a political forum ???) , the Unasur, and the OAS, will make any difference to what the Brazilian Senate , and only the Brazilian Senate, have the right to judge ?? The Brazilian Supreme Court has reiterated, the Senate has the final word.
    She just does not know when to keep quiet.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 05:28 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Terance, Stupid Canuck3, claims on another thread Poutine is one of the top 50 “inventions” from Canada.

    Proves my point there's no such thing as a smart Canadian.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 06:55 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    15 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “Show me one racist comment I've ever made.
    7 yankeeboy: ”Nobody in the USA learns anything about Canada other than they're a little stupid and that French Canadians are dirty.” http://en.mercopress.com/2016/01/05/confirmed-brazil-faces-its-worst-economic-plunge-in-25-years
    15 yankeeboy: What race are Rgs? talking monkeys? http://en.mercopress.com/2016/01/05/confirmed-brazil-faces-its-worst-economic-plunge-in-25-years
    23 yankeeboy: The problem with UK pols is not so much what they say its how they look. Do any of them shower or wash their hair before they go on TV or to work?
    en.mercopress.com/.../macri-and-obama-could-meet-at-the-end-of-marc...
    You have made disparaging remarks about both Brazilians and Canadians which is ipso facto racist. “ …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.”

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 09:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    What's your point there Stupid Canuck3?

    You never did answer, is poutine one Canada's 50 best “inventions”?

    So dumb and you don't even know it.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 09:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    22 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    “What's your point there” With the proof of a Canadian expert that you have established his premise that people like you are stupid. Secondly, using your own words against you have confirmed that you're a racist. ” …As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood.” Since you can't refute the truth of those two issues all you're left with is the fallacy of the moved 'goal-posts', what a loser.

    Apr 23rd, 2016 - 11:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • golfcronie

    @22 and @23
    Why don't you set up your own website, that way you can slag each other off for days on end and not bother the serious posters on this site, thanks in advance.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 08:50 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    23. Well, I hate to break it to you but there aren't any mention of races in those posts.

    So I always knew Canadians were a bit dim-witted compared to Americans but gosh darn if I have learned anything from this board its they're just down right dumb and practically retarded. I wonder what happened up there?

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 12:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    25 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “there aren't any mention of races in those posts” There doesn't have to be according to the UN definition.
    So your behaviour is defined by a psychologist, the UN, and you are further condemned with every post you make. Game set and match.
    “International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
    Article 1 of the Convention defines ”racial discrimination” as:
    ...any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.
    Discrimination need not be strictly based on race or ethnicity for the Convention to apply.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Convention_on_the_Elimination_of_All_Forms_of_Racial_Discrimination

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 12:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    I don't recognize the UN as a gov't body.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 01:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    27 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “I don't recognize the UN”
    Nobodies claiming you have insight let alone far sightedness, so completely you're predictable.
    Nobody cares what you recognise, what's important is that you are revealed in your true light, as a dumb, low-life lying racist bigot. Thanks, I couldn't have accomplished so much without your invaluable contributions dummy, chortle, chortle.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 02:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    And you're Canadian so nobody cares what you think.

    Next time you're in an American city watch how people look at you, see if they laugh behind your back, make fun of your accent, roll their eyes. You probably have never noticed what a laughing stock you Canucks are to us.

    We think you're like dumb hillbillies right out of the mountains.

    and we're right

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 02:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    29 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “and we're right” Who's the we? I'm afraid your on your on own with your obvious deficiencies.
    This is from a person whom a Canadian expert, who's irrefutable opinion certifies you as a person of 'low intelligence'. Thanks, for the continuing affirmation of that fact. You're the gift that keeps on giving, giving, giving, giving, giving, et al. chortle, chortle.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 02:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    But I am clearly smarter than you dumb Cancuk3.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 03:01 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    31 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Dream on, the only thing you're clearly more of is deluded. Which comes with your 'low intelligence', chortle, chortle
    Whats important is what I've proved, which is everything I've claimed about you is true. Whereas, all you are able to provide is an argumentum ad hominem. Unable to provide one solitary fact or citation to support your deluded rants, so babble on little brook as you've been bested each and very way,loser.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 04:17 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    I think your file is on repeat.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 04:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Klingon

    Dilma's desperate throwing out anything she can think of weather it makes sense or not.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 04:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    25
    Of course the correct reply should have been....
    You quoted yankeeboy...I'm Lucifer...

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 11:16 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    35 Voice, V0ice, Vestige, Think et al, sock-puppeteer extraordinaire
    I guess you sock-puppeteers need to seek solace in one another's company, The satisfaction for those of of us that don't engage in such fraudulent and deceptive practises. Is knowing that you are losing your arguments as you have resort to such dishonest activities

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 11:52 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Fred = YB+Lucifer

    I'm sure if you asked, ThinkVoice would welcome you to his Pantomime troupe.

    Apr 24th, 2016 - 11:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • prepalaw

    Why can't you two guys move your circle jerk to a different venue. I recommend Cafe Photo in Sao Paulo.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 12:16 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    37.
    Dim-witted Canadian, I hate to break it to you, but you are wasting a lot of energy on a fake.

    I only have one login

    I never lie. I don't see the point.

    I guess Luci is another loser ThinkVoice puppet. But it is hilarious that he winds you up so much.

    loser

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 08:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    36
    I guess you must be quite dumb if you didn't understand what I was actually saying @35....
    Is that a Canadian thing...?
    Or just a Terry 'dumb' thing..?

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 10:03 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    39 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    You've been outed you're done for as I've exposed you as racist liar so you have zero credibility
    You are a really primitive troll, One more that infests this forum, judging by all the droppings you leave around this must be the internet cave you live in.
    40 Voice, V0ice, Vestige, Think et al, sock-puppeteer extraordinaire
    You sidle up to an equally duplicitous liar who has praise indeed for Argentineans. “15 yankeeboy: What race are Rgs? talking monkeys?” en.mercopress.com/2015/06/29/aerolineas-argentinas-and-the-stripper-who-pulled-the-take-off-throttle
    You deserve one another, you're a match made in heaven.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 11:06 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    41.
    Show me where I am racist.

    Canucks and rgs are not a race dumbass

    Your limited comprehension is astonishing. Did you go to school in argentina?

    You're so stupid you even misunderstood that Voice's comment 35 was directed at Luci - who is even more of a loser than you.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 12:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    42 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “Show me where I am racist.”
    Here you go again lying troll “…any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life. Discrimination need not be strictly based on race or ethnicity for the Convention to apply.”
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Convention_on_the_Elimination_of_All_Forms

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 01:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    43.
    Good gosh are so dumb it is hilarious.

    A racist is one who discriminates by race
    Do you own a dictionary?

    look it up

    loser

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 02:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    @44 Fred Bates / YB/ Lucifer

    Racism,

    “…any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin”

    Fits you well.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 03:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    44 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    You're caught, your sophism is of no avail as the word is legally defined. Perhaps you can tell the following countries that their definition is wrong because you say so. ”The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination 1966 was one of the first human rights treaties to be adopted by the United Nations (UN). The Convention is widely supported, with more than 156 countries (four-fifths of the membership of the UN) having ratified it“ https://www.humanrights.gov.au/guide-law-international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial-discrimination ”…with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes…”. So you're a racist as defined by the international community.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 03:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Marti Llazo

    Too bad that the UN folks and their politically correct international-community ilk lack the intellectual capacity to distinguish between racism and ethnicism. But I suppose those with low intelligence are more likely to hold such attitudes.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 06:37 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    44 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “Do you own a dictionary? Look it up” I did and its got you covered.
    “racial harassment See RACIST ABUSE; THREATENING BEHAVIOUR.
    racial hatred: Hatred against a group of people because of their colour, race, nationality, or ethnic or national origins”
    A Dictionary of Law; FIFTH EDITION; Edited by ELIZABETH A. MARTIN; OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
    What an admission. 20 yankeeboy: “as bigoted as I am” http://en.mercopress.com/2015/11/27/brazilian-banks-follow-closely-events-in-argentina-dollar-at-12-pesos
    Both my installed English and American Thesauruses show racist as an alternate for bigot. Thanks for the confession.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 07:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    The Canucks are confused.
    Probably happens a lot up there.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 08:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    49 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Of cause with your gifts you knew you where going to be absolutely inexorably humiliated by me, right?
    71 yankeeboy “I'm never very far off when I call out people's issues. One of my many gifts.” http://en.mercopress.com/2016/01/22/macri-cameron-coincide-on-new-relationship-falklands-left-for-further-on
    Here's some others like myself who equally believe such claims are only made made by the seriously delusional, and are indicative of an unjustified oversized ego.
    “Forecasting future events is often like searching for a black cat in an unlit room, that may not even be there. ” Steve Davidson
    “The herd instinct among forecasters makes sheep look like independent thinkers. ” Edgar R. Fiedler
    “He who lives by the crystal ball soon learns to eat ground glass.” Edgar R. Fiedler

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 09:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    Fred aka Yankeeboy's attempt to create a new anonymous screen persona in Lucifer was a good idea but an abject failure from the start. He'd hardly posted 3 times before pretty much everyone knew it was him.

    To add insult to injury he then attempted to turn his new name into a sock puppet. Which didn't work out well as they keep replying to each other's posts.

    So now he is just going to troll. Which is pretty stupid when they are saying the EXACT same thing. Including the same insults.

    Honestly it hasn't been this fun since Think outed himself with not one but two sockpuppets within a short space of time.

    But whereas Think's execution shows his deviousness and untrustworthiness, Fred's seems to show autism.

    I'm sure the pantomime will drag on for a while yet through sheer embarrassment more than anything.

    Yeah yeah coffee blah blah.... told you same (supposed) insults.

    Apr 25th, 2016 - 11:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    Fred/YB/Luci

    His power to dissemble, is second only to his power to debate.

    YB is “stupid”.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 03:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucіfer

    51. I am not YB.

    I like a lot of his posts. It is great how he wind you liberal losers up.

    But if you look back at past posts he is wrong on pretty much everything he calls.

    Good gosh just 6 months ago he was predicting the in 6 months time the bcra would be out of cash. I'm smarter than that. I'm off the charts smart.

    You skippy are not smart enough to see I am not YB

    I guess that is why you are a barista

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:19 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    53.
    Why is it everyone remembers the few occasions on which my predictions were wrong?

    I don't live in the future.

    I doubt you are as smart as you think you are.

    51.
    Skippy how do you account for my “new anonymous screen persona” mocking my predictions?

    not too smart are you

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:23 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    Oh yeah, how could I ever account for this? The mind boggles.

    Anyway “Luci” who said I was a barista? I've never said that.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    55.
    It doesn't take much to boggle your mind.

    Put down the tray and tell me why your boggled mind thinks the puppet Luci is mocking me.

    You think I made a new persona to mock me?

    boggled much

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 12:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Hahaha

    The idiots are so confused.

    Good job YB
    Good job.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 12:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    “Good job, Brownie”

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 12:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Stupid Canuck1 tries so hard.

    Better on is “ If you kill your enemies, they win” Trudeau.

    That guy is a great example of how Stupid Canadians really are, vacuous idiot like your whole country.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 01:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    59 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    This guy is a great example of how a discredited proven Stupid racist liars really behaves.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 03:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    retard the only thing you have proven is that you are not very smart

    loser

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 04:14 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    I proved that long ago.

    It seems to me the posters from Canada are particularly dimwitted and that's comparing them to the Argys!

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 04:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    61,2 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    You stick with your deluded 'gifts' and worthless opinions while I will enjoy the proven irrefutable facts that I have presented. Including your own admissions against you, a Brock University study, UN Convention, and an Oxford law dictionary, plus two thesauruses. While you ”…As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood” have not been able to present even one fact that supports your xenophobic diatribes, some winner.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 07:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Brock Univeristy? Never heard of it.

    Lots of people don't recognize the UN authority.
    I think you're in the minority for presenting that as “evidence” of something.
    The UN “law” certainly isn't recognized here in the USA
    Maybe in Canada but you all don't understand Sovereignty very much anyway.
    Too weak and stupid.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 08:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    64 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Hm! Irrefutable facts or the opinion of a proven liar, well thats a no brainer.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 09:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Inapplicable laws are not facts.

    I think your file is skipping?
    Do you have a mental problem like pervasive developmental disorder or something?

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 09:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    64,66 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    “Brock Univeristy? Never heard of it.” That's neither, here nor there. Whats relevant, is you're unable to find any 'peer-review' to refute the study. So you remain a 'dummy'.
    “The UN “law” certainly isn't recognized here in the USA” “Inapplicable laws are not facts.”
    Baaaaaaa, wrong again, guessing doesn't cut it, only facts do.
    ”Using the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) to Advance Human Rights At Home
    What is the ICERD and why is it relevant to human rights work here?
    The ICERD is one of few human rights instruments of the United Nations (UN) that the US has both signed and ratified. …”
    hepraxisproject.org/using-international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial-discrimination-icerd-advance-human
    Pretty stupid trying to malign another nation when you don't even know your own nation's grade 5 history.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 10:04 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    I've never seen someone so bad at sock puppeteering since.... well... never.

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Shut up Skip.
    Nobody is talking to you

    So Stupid Canuck3 which mental disorder have you been diagnosed with?

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Skip

    Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Apr 26th, 2016 - 11:59 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    69 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    “We must make a personal attack when there is no argumentative basis for our speech.” Cicero, Pro Flacco, c.58. B.C
    “Which mental disorder have you been diagnosed with?” Well your delusions have been attached to a need to compensate for an 'inferiority complex' to the following. People who believe they have a 'gifts' is usually the result of grandiose delusions (GD) or delusions of grandeur.
    “The grandiose subtype of delusional disorder involves the conviction of one's importance and uniqueness, … or enjoys some extraordinary powers or abilities.”
    www.minddisorders.com/Br-Del/Delusional-disorder.html
    It is also a symptom of schizophrenia “They may think they have extraordinary powers and gifts.” www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/36942.php
    Your the gift that just keeps on giving.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 12:08 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    71
    I have an extraordinary gift for you....an abundant supply...
    '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    You're...

    Don't make me tell you again...

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 12:35 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    71. You would do yourself a big favor by reading this:

    http://www.ucd.ie/artspgs/semantics/ConsequencesErudite.pdf

    You really have no idea how stupid you sound.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 01:15 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    73 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    But not half as stupid as you, enjoy the rout. The gift that keeps giving.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 01:20 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    That would be impossible since you're from Canada.
    Do you not understand what I am saying?

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 09:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    75 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Devoid of of any factual accomplishments you do the only thing you're able to, resort to racist retorts, and prove how really intelligent you are.
    The problem for you is I do understand perfectly what your saying, and the myriad of possible mental health diagnoses that accompany those that suffer from the delusions that they have 'gifts'.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 10:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    76.

    “and prove how really intelligent you are”

    Nice of you to acknowledge it.

    Is English your first language?

    A native speaker of English would understand the subtle but significant difference between:

    “and prove how really intelligent you are”

    and

    “and prove how intelligent you really are”

    I think you probably wanted to use the latter.

    So English not your first language eh.

    The plot thickens.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 12:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucіfer

    77.
    tick tock

    no come back from terry

    does silence not mean consent in terry-world?

    Did he specify a duration of silence before consent was assumed?

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 12:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    Yeah. I think his words were

    “..silence gives consent. In law, the silence of a party implies his consent… Thus, who keeps silent consents; silence means consent; silent consent is same as expressed consent; consent by conduct is as good as expressed consent. This is an implied term in law....”

    And you are right, no duration for the silence is specified.

    So with dumbass terry-logic his consent is implied

    ruh roh

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 12:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    78,79 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Your arguing with your self, thats got to be the most pathetic piece of sock-puppetry I've witnessed. Please give yourself a shake you lack the historical knowledge of a grade 5 student. So with you're decidedly lacking in basic education skills you're in no position to question anyone else's education. So stick to what you do best , racist diatribes.
    My cousin who was a dual citizen, her father being American, was murdered in the states. “50 years later, an Olympian's mutilation in Reno still shocks | Gruesome murder shook city 50 years ago” http://www.reno.com/story/news/crime/2013/04/05/50-years-later-an-olympians-mutilation-in-reno-still-/28936877/
    The electric light bulb, television, telephone, Velcro, zips, insulin, penicillin, Smarties and Superman were all invented in Canada.
    On a train car there were a Canadian, an American, a spectacular looking blonde and a frightfully awful looking fat lady. After several minutes of the trip the train happens to pass through a dark tunnel, and the unmistakable sound of a slap is heard. When they leave the tunnel, the American had a big red slap mark on his cheek.
    The blonde thought “That American s.o.b wanted to touch me and by mistake, he must have put his hand on the fat lady, who in turn must have slapped his face.”
    The fat lady thought “That dirty old American laid his hands on the blonde and she smacked him.”
    The American thought “That damn Canadian put his hand on that blonde and by mistake she slapped me.”
    The Canadian thought “I hope there's another tunnel soon so I can smack that stupid American again.”

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 05:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @73 Lucifer

    www.ucd.ie/artspgs/semantics/ConsequencesErudite.pdf

    Good one, you hit the nail on the head.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 05:23 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    81 Jack Bauer
    Whats the old maxim “Keep it simple stupid”. Like you two 'wingnuts' have any other realistic choice.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 05:49 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Stupid Canuck3 must be a French Canadian because English clearly isn't its first language.
    The syntax is all wrong.

    Poor thing, it thinks its smart.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 06:22 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    83 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Still trying to rely on an argumentum ad hominem supported solely by your own personal opinion. Just unsupported claims on a fact-less horizon. Why don't you try to bring your 'gifts' to bear as you have not one iota of proof. But, thats how you goofball fanatics arrive at all your conclusions, reliance on 'hunches'(gifts). Still unable to produce any evidence refuting a study that shows racists like you are unintelligent, that t he US has signed a UN Convention that defines you as a racist. Your admission that you're a bigot is defined as a racist thus:
    British English Thesaurus
    bigot noun
    dogmatist, partisan, sectarian, prejudiced person; racist, racialist, sexist, homophobe, chauvinist, jingoist, anti-Semite; informal male chauvinist pig, MCP.
    American English Thesaurus
    bigot noun
    he comes off as a naïve, closed-minded bigot: chauvinist, partisan, sectarian; racist, sexist, homophobe, dogmatist,
    Dictionary Version 2.2.1 (143.1)
    @2005-2011 Apple Inc. All Rights Reserved

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 07:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Stupid Canuck3 I've not admitted anything.

    Posting irrelevant words and then asking me to refute them takes a special kind of stupid that I don't possess.

    Just admit that you are stupid or prove otherwise.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 09:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    85 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    “Your admission that you're a bigot is defined as a racist thus:” “I've not admitted anything.” In addition to being a racist you're also now confirmed liar. The Gift that keeps on giving, chortle,chortle. Come on smartie refute those apples. I don't have to “prove otherwise” as you're doing a great job for me, LMAO.
    #20 yankeeboy: “as bigoted as I am” en.mercopress.com/2015/11/27/brazilian-banks-follow-closely-events-in-argentina-dollar-at-12-pesos

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 10:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Aww poor thing...you've gone right off the rails.

    your file is skipping.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 10:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    87 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Thanks for confirmation that you are unable to refute any claims made against you. You have no proof or facts to redeem your losing position.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 10:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Stupid Canuck3.
    When you can explain why you posted that Poutine was one of Canada's 50 great inventions I will do the same.

    Except you did post it.

    Stupid Cancuck3 living up to the name.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 10:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    89 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Another lie as I never posted any such thing. In response to an assertion by you I cited three URL's of other peoples 'lists'. So a citation is not my compilation. Just another none-event in the life of a proven unintelligent racist liar.

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 11:13 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    You did on another thread.
    Trying to prove Canadians were smart.

    It proved it to me
    hahahaha

    Apr 27th, 2016 - 11:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    91 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    If what you are claiming refutes my version of the event. Then it begs the question, why don't show the evidence? It's not a question that Canadians are particularly smart. It's more the case that you are extraordinarily stupid. As for example, on this thread you have been throughly pummelled and have lost all the issues that have been laid at your doorstep.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 01:30 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    92. terry
    Do you actually mean to post what you post?

    You clearly struggle to express yourself concisely in the English language. You probably hear that a lot.

    In your post @80 you

    1) mention a tragic murder case (irrelevant and bizarre);
    2) list off some inventions (irrelevant and bizarre);
    3) then relate a joke that relies on national stereotyping for its humor (irrelevant and bizarre).

    At no point do you refute the mounting evidence that English is not your first language. Your silence on this matter can only be taken as support for that evidence.

    Like many immigrants who are eager to demonstrate their command of English you construct overly word sentences. Unfortunately it doesn't achieve the desired effect. You should keep studying English, but pay more attention to nuances of native use in order to improve.

    Besides English you should also go back and study basic science before you foray in to the world of scientific inventions. The pancreas produces insulin. It is not a Canadian invention.

    School children know that.

    I realize such stupid statements are a consequence of your zeal to defend your adopted homeland, but the end result is that you just look foolish and lacking in basic education.

    Go back to school, eat fewer smarties and read less Superman.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 09:34 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    93 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    So after making a specific claim in post #91 and being challenged in #92 to prove your claim, you have failed to do so. Therefore, confirming such a claim is untrue and thus reconfirming you are a liar. So your latest post based entirely on your discredited personal opinion. Devoid of any proven facts, your response is off-topic and thereby totally irrelevant.
    “We must make a personal attack when there is no argumentative basis for our speech.” Cicero, Pro Flacco, c.58. B.C

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 10:58 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    94. terry
    There is no attack @93. In fact I am providing useful guidance for your self-improvement.

    The fact you don't understand that is further evidence of your lack of comprehension in English.

    You continue to fail to provide any explanation for why you neither comprehend nor write English like a native English speaker.

    “Terence Hill” and Italian actor who changed his name from Mario Girotti.

    Interesting.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 11:25 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    He has some sort of mental disorder. A kind of ADHD it seems.
    Guarantee it.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 11:52 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    95,96 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Girotti is the name of a Renaissance painter who died without issue. I was born with this name, I can only speculate that Sr. Girott obtained his version from a résumé that I gave to Robert Altman. Another deflecting none-issue. “Sort of mental disorder”. You sure have, your 'gifts” are the symptoms of an inferiority complex, grandiose delusions (GD), and schizophrenia. 71 yankeeboy “I'm never very far off when I call out people's issues. One of my many gifts.” en.mercopress.com/2016/01/22/macri-cameron-coincide-on-new-relationship-falklands-left-for-further-on You're the 'gift' that just keeps on giving.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 12:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    97 Mario
    How can your evident mental disorder be considered a “deflecting none-issue”?

    Or as a native English speaker would put it: a “non-issue”.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 02:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    It's not denying it or proving otherwise.
    So I guess its true.

    How can it think that YB and I are the same?
    Poor thing

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 02:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    Yeah. No denial, just the sound of silence:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzsaE68IfXI

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 02:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @82 T.Hill
    “81 Jack Bauer
    Whats the old maxim “Keep it simple stupid”. Like you two 'wingnuts' have any other realistic choice.”

    That's right, what else could we expect from an idiot like you ?
    Does anyone on this forum ever agree with anything you say, except for the other asshole known as Brasshole ?

    @93 YB
    It is the idiot's trademark. Trying hard to sound intelligent, cultured and smarter than anyone else. His mania of trying to sound superior is a joke, just as laughable as listening to our fat cow of a president who can't even connect her brain to her flabby mouth.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 03:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    99, 100 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    “Yeah. No denial, just the sound of silence:” Exactly, you no longer can deny that you are a proven racist, which is further of proof of low-intelligence. That I have proved you're a liar so you have no credibility left. Through your own admissions, you indicate that that you're delusional and rely on your innate fantasies to form judgements. “How can it think that YB and I are the same?” because we're not as dumb as you.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 03:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Stupid Canuck3
    It's proven without a doubt you're dumb.

    For the umpteenth time I'm not YB

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 04:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    101 Jack
    100% agree.
    When he says things like:
    “Girotti is the name of a Renaissance painter who died without issue”

    A normal person would say:

    “Girotti is the name of a Renaissance painter”

    He doesn't understand it is not necessary to state that the Renaissance painter is dead.

    And if the redundancy of stating that he is dead weren't enough, he then adds “without issue” - feigning legal knowledge.

    Very sad.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 04:31 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    103 Lucifer aka yankeeboy “For the umpteenth time I'm not YB”.
    A claim from a proven liar, who's pretending they are the Bobbsey Twins. Well there are three of us who don't believe you, Fred the proven loony.
    101 Jack Bauer
    Who cares what your opinion is on anything, as there's never any credibility accompanying your claims, just unsubstantiated rhetoric.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 04:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    105
    Mario you are hilarious.

    You prattle on like this were a court of law where evidence can be submitted and verified. It is an internet forum you fool. You cannot “prove” this or that.

    Your “evidence” that I am a racist and a liar is based on what you think I have posted. You are not smart enough to work out that logins are hijacked and therefore what you think are my comments may not be. In your make-believe court of law your “evidence” would be unreliable evidence.

    I suggest you graciously concede that I am correct on this point or even better, remain silent. If you insist in prattling on I will demonstrate the fundamental flaw in your endless boring arguments.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 05:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    103,104 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Warning! Sock-puppetry alert, its hand-to-hand commentary. “Without issue” Numbnuts it means he had no children, so the name died-out, so even his first name presented had to be a 'stage-name'. Do try to keep up, or is it a case of laying every nuance out, because you're so limited?
    106 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    Meanwhile in the real world, no one is allowed to benefit from their own fraud. I have proved prima facia that you are a racist, therefor I have met my burden of proof. If you are claiming “logins are hijacked ” then burden is yours prove it.
    Deep thinking, Philosophy; Burden of proof
    Burden of proof (or onus probandi in Latin) is the obligation on somebody presenting a new idea (a claim) to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing “side” to prove the evidence presented is not adequate. Burdens of proof are key to having logically valid statements: if claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.
    Abuse
    Burden of proof is often abused in rhetoric and arguments.
    Shifting the burden
    Fallacious shifting of the burden of proof occurs if someone makes a claim that needs justification, then demands that the opponent justify the opposite of the claim. The opponent has no such burden until evidence is presented for the claim.
    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 06:25 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    There you go again using 100 words where 10 would do.
    Throwing around legal phrases like you are in your imaginary court.
    It is pathitic.
    Are you a failed law student?

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 06:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hіll

    Ok YB I concede.

    I withdraw all my accusations against you.
    I have no proof that you are a liar or a racist.

    I am a failed law student.
    English is not my first language.

    I am not very smart.
    I apologise for boring everyone with my tedious, incoherent posts.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 06:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    ADHD for sure.

    Plus it thinks its an attorney.

    Stupid Canuck3 is living up to the nick.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 06:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    ruh roh!

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 06:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Conqueroʳ

    @109
    You slug.
    You cheese monkey.
    You disappointment.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 07:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Told you a meltdown was imminent.

    Canuck3 and Canuck1 are finally catching on.
    Baby steps but you can't expect much from these people

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 07:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Troy Tempest

    @112 Conqueror

    Welcome back.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 07:34 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @104 YB
    the “smarter than thou” always flaunts 'his' opinion as if it were fact, likening it to proof...a real deluded pussy. He obviously doesn't know the difference between an opinion and proof , reason why he claims (in his pedantic #107) “I have proved prima facia that you are a racist, therefor I have met my burden of proof.” .....I mean, what sort of an idiot thinks that, or worse, actually says it ? only a stupid socialist who can't tell the difference between a lie and the truth.

    @105 Terry
    “101 Jack Bauer
    Who cares what your opinion is on anything, as there's never any credibility accompanying your claims, just unsubstantiated rhetoric.”

    An opinion does not need “substantiation” ...or 'proof', as you like to say... When you learn that simple lesson, maybe you'll be promoted to 'chief' latrine cleaner. Then you can throw your weight around with people who can't tell you to f*ck off.

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 08:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    115. He sounds like an uneducated idiot who is working his was through “words of the day” calendar.

    Plus he absolutely has a mental disorder.
    I am sure he washes his hands a couple hundred times a day
    and switches off lights 5 times just to make sure

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 08:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    114
    You seriously need to get some glasses....

    Apr 28th, 2016 - 11:32 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • MuppetPaster

    109 Terence
    Do you see now why your “evidence” is unreliable?

    I am sure you are a very good lawyer and that your first language is English.
    The YB puppet goes too far sometime to make his point. He is booked in for some retraining.

    Keep up the good work.

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 11:51 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    That's right, the malicious personal attacks are not warranted...
    I enjoy a good argument with Terry Hill...he puts a goodly amount of research into his posts...
    I hardly ever agree with them, but still enjoyable...

    Although hilarious for a Yank to be lecturing a Canadian in the use of English...

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 04:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Is the truth really malicious?

    He researched that nonsense?
    Give me a break.
    He's be laughed out of HIgh School in the USA.

    I guess we shouldn't make fun of people with mental disorders.

    unless they deserve it

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 04:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:06 AM
    To: MercoPress - South Atlantic News Agency
    Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
    Further to my complaint that my identity was hi-jacked please note
    this same individual has made numerous racist comments against Canada
    and Canadians. He has also made similar comments against other
    nationalities and nations including Brazil that I am aware of. This is
    contrary to your stated policy “discriminative comments (based
    on…nationality, …any other offensive or inappropriate behaviour will
    not be tolerated. Here are some previous occasions of same behaviour.”
    7 yankeeboy: ”Nobody in the USA learns anything about Canada other
    than they're a little stupid and that French Canadians are dirty.”
    en.mercopress.com/2016/01/05/confirmed-brazil-faces-its-worst-economic-plunge-in-25-years
    15 yankeeboy: What race are Rgs? talking monkeys?
    en.mercopress.com/2015/06/29/aerolineas-argentinas-and-the-stripper-who-pulled-the-take-off-throttle
    23 yankeeboy: The problem with UK pols is not so much what they say
    its how they look. Do any of them shower or wash their hair before
    they go on TV or to work?
    en.mercopress.com/.../macri-and-obama-could-meet-at-the-end-of-marc...

    Yours Truly
    Terence Hill

    On 4/28/16, MercoPress - South Atlantic News Agency

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 05:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @119 Voice
    “I enjoy a good argument with Terry Hill...he puts a goodly amount of research into his posts...”

    Surprised that you 'think' you can 'enjoy' an argument with Terry Hill . He demands 'proof' of everything, he does not accept opinions for what they are and yet he is very opinionated....and of course, he is always right - in his own, modest opinion. In my opinion he is full of bs....I can't prove it, but still doesn't change what I - and quite a few others - think of him.

    As to his 'goodly research', seems his home must be crammed with dictionaries and books on (other people's) quotes, which he frantically and fanatically resorts to as he has no opinion of his own....a really odd bod, who thinks he is superior to everyone else....the kind of idiot everyone avoids at the club because he is so predictable and overbearing. As they say here, “uma mala sem alça”, or a nuisance such as “a suitcase without a handle”...

    Near the end, your “I hardly ever agree with them...” says it all.

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 07:12 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    122 Jack Bauer
    I can't disagree with much of what you say...
    ..but there is nothing in his posts that warrant a coordinated character assassination by several parties...
    Live and let live...

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 07:30 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Lucifer

    Except he starts it.

    Canuck3 running to mama. Canadians are so pathetic.

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 07:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @123 Voice
    “..but there is nothing in his posts that warrant a coordinated character assassination by several parties...”

    well, how about a little overbearing haughtiness ?

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 08:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    122 Jack Bauer
    Oh! excuse me all to blazes I had know idea that your word was sacrosanct, and was therefor unchallengeable. If you want to preach get yourself to a church. If you post on a public forum your open to being challenged, since nobody has died and made you God. It's all in your childish little mind that anybody cares enough to act superior to you, none of us are that important. Proofs are the demands of philosophy, rhetoric, or arguments. The fact that you adhere to undemocratic principles and insist that you should have the final word. Is just a short slippery slope to the final solution.
    124 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    No! but I am, or rather Mercopress is going to finish it for me.

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 09:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    125 Jack Bauer
    I have my moments...
    126
    You are targeting the wrong person with your complaint, which is more about your identity being hijacked...
    You are jumping to incorrect conclusions....
    Your identity has not been hijacked...it just looks that way, I can assure you that YB has neither the knowledge nor the savvy to do this, it is someone else entirely...
    It is a clever trick that Mercopress has no control over, there is an easy way to remedy it...
                                                                  Think about it!

    Apr 29th, 2016 - 10:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @125 Voice
    Who doesn't ?

    Continuing from # 125, you have obviously read # 126....Need I say anything more ? proofs, undemocratic, bla-bla-bla......he still doesn't get it.

    Apr 30th, 2016 - 06:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    128 Jack Bauer
    You're the one that still doesn't get it. I don't expect anyone to except my assertions, carte blanche. So am not going to except anything less than what I require of myself. Moreover, validation is mandatory for all branches of logic. Therefor, I will not merely accept, you're not so humble opinion. Partially someone from the political extreme, who's preferred government is a military dictatorship.

    Apr 30th, 2016 - 07:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @129 T.Hill,
    Exactly what I've said all along : you are proving my point : First, you don't get it because it's too easy to understand for your complicated brain ; and second, ”So am not going to except (oops! should be ACCEPT ) anything less than what I require of myself “ sounds so supercilious, you placing yourself on a pedestal, as if you were something more than a moron....But keep it up, your vain arrogance is providing us with a few good laughs.
    Ah, before I forget, look up the definition of ”opinion”....I'm sure you'll find it one of your many dictionaries, as you obviously don't trust the Oxford Dictionary. Then ask someone to explain it to you.
    Let's not get started about the my posts on the Military regime (which you, typically, as a socialist, totally misunderstand), or I might have to remind you of your 'opinion' that the PT 'was' a minority party.......it probably WILL be in the near future, but it is still the 2nd largest party, after the PMDB......care to comment on this (i.e., give us more of your bs ?)

    Apr 30th, 2016 - 10:06 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    130 Jack Bauer
    Please give the evidence to support your 'opinion' that I am a socialist. You won't be able too, as I'm not. You are the one with all the political luggage.
    Moreover, if you where mature you'd be able to present a viable and coherent presentation. Instead of acting like an immature ten year old. Get over yourself, if your going to dish it out then expect it back in kind.
    “PT 'was' a minority party..”. Hello in there! There is no single majority party in Brazil, their all minority parties.

    Apr 30th, 2016 - 11:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    opinion/əˈpɪnjən/
    noun
    a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

    It isn't necessary to give evidence to support an opinion...if a person disagrees with an opinion the onus is upon them to refute the opinion with facts to the contrary...
    Or accept that everyone is entitled to their own opinion....

    ps...In my opinion, I think you mean “baggage”...

    May 01st, 2016 - 03:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    132 Voice, V0ice, Vestige, Think et al, sock-puppeteer extraordinaire
    “It isn't necessary to give evidence to support an opinion...if a person disagrees with an opinion the onus is upon them to refute the opinion” Nonsense, its who asserts bears the burden to prove, not the opponent to disprove. If you fail to do this then your opponent wins by default.

    Logical Fallacies
    Ignoring the Burden of Proof:

    Generally speaking, he who asserts must prove. An assertion is a statement offered as a conclusion without supporting evidence. Since an argument is defined as a logical relationship between premise and conclusion, a simple assertion is not an argument. Writers sometimes forget this, and their articles can be littered with assertion after assertion. In the end, the duty to support an assertion is on the writer, not the reader (like the burden of proof is on the accuser in court, rather than the accused).
    http://learn.lexiconic.net/fallacies/index.htm

    Burden of proof (or onus probandi in Latin) is the obligation on somebody presenting a new idea (a claim) to provide evidence to support its truth (a warrant). Once evidence has been presented, it is up to any opposing “side” to prove the evidence presented is not adequate. Burdens of proof are key to having logically valid statements: if claims were accepted without warrants, then every claim could simultaneously be claimed to be true.
    Abuse
    Shifting the burden
    Fallacious shifting of the burden of proof occurs if someone makes a claim that needs justification, then demands that the opponent justify the opposite of the claim. The opponent has no such burden until evidence is presented for the claim.
    http://learn.lexiconic.net/fallacies/index.htm

    May 01st, 2016 - 03:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Voice

    assertion/əˈsəːʃ(ə)n/
    noun
    a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief.

    opinion/əˈpɪnjən/
    noun
    a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge.

    I see a major difference....
    You don't...

    May 01st, 2016 - 05:56 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    134 Voice, V0ice, Vestige, Think et al, sock-puppeteer extraordinaire
    You can nit-pick as much you want. But, all thats important is the consequences of such act. For instance any naked opinion is absolutely destroyed by me merely responding with 'bullshit'. So check that out in your dictionary, as I'm not required to interpret your futile irrelevant sophistry as the burden of proof blows your claim out of the water.

    May 01st, 2016 - 06:20 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    TH
    At post 109 you say

    “I am not very smart.”

    That is clearly evident from your incoherent posts, but can you prove it.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 08:13 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    136 Lucifer aka yankeeboy
    I didn't say that, as my rebuttal in post #121 clearly shows. But in your case, your posts are the best evidence there is. The 'gift' that just keeps on giving LOL.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 11:32 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    TH
    So you are saying you didn't make the remarks at 109.
    When I told you that I didn't make the racist remarks that you attribute to me, your reply was:

    “If you are claiming “logins are hijacked ” then burden is yours prove it.”

    Can you prove it?

    May 02nd, 2016 - 12:53 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    138 Lucifer aka yankeeboy, Fred Bates
    Yes by immediately disassociating myself from it is a sufficency. So I have met all the legal requirements to absolve me of any responsibility. Whereas your acquiescence to dozens of racist utterances condemns you.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 02:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    TH
    “Whereas your acquiescence to dozens of racist utterances condemns you.”

    Please give the evidence to support your opinion that I am a racist. You won't be able too, as I'm not.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 02:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @131 T.Hill
    “Please give the evidence to support your 'opinion' that I am a socialist...”.

    How abt yr intransigent defense of Dilma & Lula; yr refusal to accept :1) the great probability they’re guilty of the crimes they’re being accused of ; 2) the reason why most of the PT leadership is in prison ; 3) what the majority of Brazilians now firmly believe - based on what they’ve seen since Oct ’14 ; 4) the shitty mess the radical left has made…It is more than ample evidence of yr political stance... even more ridiculous given yr very limited knowledge on Brazilian politics, as admitted 18 July ’15, “I'm in no way familiar with the idiosyncrasies of Brazil's definition of 'influence peddling.'…while anything is possible I would be extremely surprised if Lula was in fact culpable”…...
    Really ? Need I go on ?
    Also would like to refer to yr 03 Sept ’15 post to Tik Tok : “The PT is a minority party that has had to rely on a shaky conditional coalition” - then take a look at your Sept 24th post in which, when challenged, you had the nerve to say “You cannot produce any statement where I have stated “that the PT is a minority political party..”” ; You see, just another lie.
    Ryr 131 of today “There is no single majority party in Brazil, their all minority parties”..” (oops! shouldn’t ‘their’ be 'they're'?)
    But forget the mistake, and let’s get back to yr statement that the PT is a ‘minority’ party…big gaffe; it’s the largest Brazilian party...but classifying them as minority or a majority party , as you do, makes no sense......given our political structure with over 30 parties, it’s unlikely any ONE party, alone, would ever have a majority ? so, enough of yr minority/majority ‘party’ bs, which means nothing – what does, is the PT forming a coalition with the PMDB and the PP to form a ‘majority’ in Congress....very different. AGW, the PT will desintegrate and disappear. Much to your chagrin.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 02:45 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hіll

    139 Lucifer aka yankeeboy, Fred Bates
    I immediately disassociating myself with post 139, meeting all the legal requirements to absolve me of any responsibility.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 02:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • yankeeboy

    TH
    So you disassociate yourself from yourself.
    Meltdown.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 02:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @143 YB

    TH is now sounding like Hepatia......at least he/she/it is human...

    May 02nd, 2016 - 03:42 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    140 Lucifer aka yankeeboy, Fred Bates
    There is no requirement for me to produce any evidence, as you are condemned out of your own mouth.
    141 Jack Bauer
    If you weren't completely transfixed by your own bias you would know that malfeasance by older persons with no prior history is comparatively rare. My interest in the current crisis is based on the principle that no one should be condemned unheard, a proposition you would deny. So if you were acting fairly you would you would have shown where I equally disavowed socialism and reactionaries alike. But, in your twisted little world , concepts like ”fair play' have no place. I say yet again, all the parties in Brazil are minority parties. A majority party is 50% + 1, politics 101. The rest of your claims I don't recall, and since you provide no proper citation, I have no way of ascertaining.
    My purpose is simply to challenge red-necked propagandism. You have made outrageous claims, which when checked against reliable opinions don't hold water. If you want to rant on a public forum be prepared to be challenged. You don't like it, tough, you've no entitlement to dictate to anyone. State your opinion, validate or don't. If only the former and it isn't apparently true, then your failure to meet your burden, may be queried.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 04:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Jack Bauer

    @ 145 Terry
    In order to waste as little time as possible on you, who have admitted you know fuck all about Brazilian politics, I'd just like to comment on one of your stupid assertions...“...you would know that malfeasance by older persons with no prior history is comparatively rare”.”
    Just fyi, I've been following Dilma's career (and of others who were, until recently, part of the PT leadership) since she was an urban guerilla fighter, who confessed to have participated in terrorist activities, such as kidnapping for ransom, including the kidnapping of an American ambassador, the assassination of an American Army Captain, bank hold-ups, assaults to private residences to steal money....you name it...her criminal record is on file - look it up.
    As for the LullaRat, I've been accompanying his antics since 1971, when he worked at Mercedes Benz for a few years until he put one of his 'pinkies' in a lathe so that he could retire (as an invalid) and dedicate himself, full time, to the largest union in the auto industry. His history of dirty dealings and corruption were already in the news 40 years ago......he has always hated the upper class - those that provide the jobs - so he went into politics, where the easy money went to his head...He has long forgotten the working class, of which he's not been part of for a long time, and now only “uses” them to try to remain in power .....and today, despite his notorious lack of even a halfway decent education , he is part of the elite - at least in terms of wealth. So much for the working man's man. He has corrupted himself and displays the ego of a madman. Perhaps you should do some serious research, not just read the opinions of the left-wing press. You didn't live here in the 70's, you don't live here now, yet you profess to know more than those who did, and do.
    And re the ”minority' bs, give it up, you can't unring the bell.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 09:43 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Terence Hill

    146 Jack Bauer
    So you spell out a litany accusations with not one iota evidence. So failing to comply with all the requirements of rules of logic. Which have carefully been established to ensure fairness and truth. So whether your correct or not is irrelevant, as it is not for me to confirm what you're asserting. So either you're too lazy or your claims are false. But mere professing doesn't confirm anything, in fact it thoroughly detracts, as your claims fail to meet even the most rudimentary requirements. All I have to say is 'bullshit' and that totally kiboshes your presentation, as there is no burden on me to prove or disprove anything. For example Lula, except for your opinion, he was never even ben charged with anything. So under internationally recognized standards he is blameless. So what you call 'opinion' is neither here nor there, its just a puff of nothingness. So spew out your empty vindictive propaganda, because at end of the day thats all it will ever remain. Moreover you have no idea where I live, but don't let that lack of knowledge prevent you from professing an opinion, as it hasn't in the past.

    May 02nd, 2016 - 10:46 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!