MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, October 6th 2026 - 19:32 UTC

 

 

Milei prepares bill to toughen sanctions on companies operating in the Falklands

Tuesday, September 15th 2026 - 09:53 UTC
Full article 3 comments
The package will be a legislative test for Milei, whose libertarian coalition lacks majorities in Congress The package will be a legislative test for Milei, whose libertarian coalition lacks majorities in Congress

Argentine President Javier Milei is preparing legislation this week to toughen sanctions against companies operating in the Falklands, a move analysts say could raise tensions with Britain beyond the oil sector.

The bill, titled the National Sovereignty Defense Law, would amend Law 26,659, which already bars unauthorized hydrocarbon activity on the disputed continental shelf and provides for disqualifications of between five and twenty years. Milei announced it on September 3 in a televised address, alongside a decree to speed up existing sanctions proceedings. The text will be introduced in the lower house.

The legislation builds on proceedings the Argentine government says it has opened against at least 60 companies and individuals linked to offshore oil exploration around the archipelago, which Argentina calls the Malvinas and claims as its own despite British control. Argentina invaded the Islands in 1982 and fought a ten-week war before surrendering to Britain. Islanders confirmed their status as a British Overseas Territory in the 2013 referendum.

Congressional aide Marcelo Seghini told Reuters the text provides for tougher penalties for unauthorized operations and would extend sanctions to affiliates and to other activities affecting Argentine natural resources. According to the same source, the government is considering including the fishing industry, which underpins much of the Islands' economy. The Argentine government has not confirmed that scope or responded to queries about the companies affected.

The move follows a criminal complaint filed last week against companies linked to the offshore Sea Lion project, operated by Israel's Navitas Petroleum alongside Britain's Rockhopper Exploration. Both maintain the project holds valid licenses from the Falklands government and do not expect Milei's actions to derail development.

A government document reviewed by Reuters lists shareholders and financial intermediaries among the firms marked for possible sanctions, including Vanguard, First Eagle, Canaccord, Interactive Investor and Hargreaves Lansdown. Oilfield services providers SLB, Baker Hughes and Halliburton have said in recent days they will not take part in activities on the Islands.

The announcement followed comments by U.S. President Donald Trump suggesting Washington could reconsider its neutral position on the dispute. For Marcelo Elizondo, Argentina's representative to the International Chamber of Commerce, this was not a bill prepared over time: Trump's remarks, he said, “created a climate that the government sought to exploit quickly.”

The package will be a legislative test for Milei, whose libertarian coalition lacks majorities in Congress. Opposition lawmaker Aldo Leiva said the president “is clearly using the Malvinas for political opportunism.”

Companies and investors are weighing whether the sanctions could ultimately reach firms with operations in Argentina, including the Vaca Muerta shale formation. Congress receives the 2027 budget proposal on Tuesday, with defense spending expected to rise.

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • imoyaro

    Time to toughen sanctions on Argentina...

    Sep 15th, 2026 - 02:04 am 0
  • Freddie Foster

    Stop them from visiting the islands,

    Sep 15th, 2026 - 12:08 pm 0
  • Terence Hill

    “Law 26,659, which already bars unauthorized hydrocarbon activity on the disputed continental shelf”

    ”Under the Palmas decision, three important rules for resolving island territorial disputes were decided:
    Firstly, title based on contiguity has no standing in international law.
    International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the North Sea continental shelf cases, in which Denmark and the Netherlands based their claim inter alia on the doctrine of proximity, i.e., that the part of the continental shelf closest to the part of the state in question falls automatically under that state's jurisdiction. In these cases the ICJ rejected any contiguity type of approach. As for continuity, it is argued, the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf and Contiguous Zone, Article 1, now contained in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention, Article 76, does not support the view that coastal states have sovereignty over islands above the continental shelf. On the contary it laid down doctrine that islands had their own “continental shelves,” p.74
    The Falklands/Malvinas Case Breaking the Deadlock in the Anglo-Argentine...By Roberto C. Laver

    Sep 16th, 2026 - 03:56 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!