MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, December 23rd 2024 - 12:15 UTC

 

 

Argentina analyzing Uruguayan counterproposal for joint river monitoring plan

Thursday, July 8th 2010 - 08:13 UTC
Full article 18 comments

“The ball is now on the Argentine court” said Uruguayan Vice-president Danilo Astori commenting on the country’s counterproposal for the monitoring plan to be jointly applied with Argentina to pulp mills, other industries and urban locations straddling the shared River Uruguay. Read full article

Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • hakohn

    ...the fine art of going nowhere fast.

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 12:15 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • Hoytred

    ping PONG

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 12:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    good things take time, this should be really good it took almost 4 years.

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 02:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • harrier61

    All your life, right, gassy?

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 03:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • fredbdc

    I can't imagine Argentina allowing environmental inspections of the old paper plants along the Uruguay River. They will be found to be polluting the river and forced to close. I guess that is why Uruguay is pressing for this so they can increase the production for their own plants.

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 03:10 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    I am happy with the Gualeguaychu community in Argentina who have contributed their time and efforts tremendously for this cause, I invite them also to retake the bridge and stop all travel into and out of Uruguays if the terms of the agreement are not met, I also implore of them to stay involved and to ask for Gualeguaychu comunity to have oversight of the plant and to monitor all chemichal use and dispossal, if this last two terms can't be met, I implore them to re-take the bridge, I will like to give my gratitude to everyone who has contributed to find a solution to this problem. Thanks again Gualeguaychu.

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 04:48 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • jerry

    Two wrongs do not make a right, and nobody should condone breaking the law (or the Argentina constitution, for that matter).

    Jul 08th, 2010 - 08:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    that is right jerry, we have to respect the Argentine constitution and liberate Malvinas as well as deport all illegal aliens from Malvinas, you tell them jerry.

    Jul 09th, 2010 - 07:38 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zethe

    Maybie on planet avargas, meanwhile here on earth it's not going to happen.

    Jul 09th, 2010 - 10:06 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    That is not what seems to be coming out of Argentina and UN, or did you forget the world is not just UK ?

    Jul 09th, 2010 - 11:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zethe

    Nothing is coming out of the UN. All thats coming out of argentina is hot air as usual.

    Jul 09th, 2010 - 02:58 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    you are right nobody listens to UN, when UN says anything is like nobody said anything I agree, this is why Argentina is better off getting nukes from Iran or N Korea, before we get blamed for WMD we better get our hand on some nukes while the threat of occupation is still in the air to support our argument.

    Jul 09th, 2010 - 11:50 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zethe

    Go for it, get as many nukes as you like mate, it's not going to make a difference.

    Jul 10th, 2010 - 01:24 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    I was not asking, I was telling and thanks the support #13 as long as it makes a difference to Argentina's national security and territorial integrity is all we care about.

    Jul 10th, 2010 - 03:54 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • zethe

    It doesn't. To be honest they're just a very expensive waste of money. If a nation was to launch a nuke it would likely end in total world destruction with all states launching their nukes. So it's a one trick pony with the only prize being everyone in the world dying.

    If Argentina really wants to sort it's “territorial integrity ” You would do well sorting our your army navy and airforce.

    Jul 10th, 2010 - 09:33 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • harrier61

    I think we should adopt gassy's method for making a point. So, leaving out all the likely sites that a government would plant a nuke in BA, where should a private operation put theirs?

    Jul 10th, 2010 - 04:27 pm - Link - Report abuse 0
  • avargas2001

    #15 all we need are nukes and to nationalize all UK assets in Argentina, we will not need to fire a shot if we take thei assets, or if we target pirat platform used to conduct an oil theft in Argentine waters.

    Jul 12th, 2010 - 08:42 am - Link - Report abuse 0
  • harrier61

    Be careful, gassy. Those deep sea squid you like to mate with may be in Argentine waters.

    Or perhaps gassy is all het up because the squid don't fancy him?

    Jul 12th, 2010 - 12:05 pm - Link - Report abuse 0

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!