Peru and Mexico signed this week a trade agreement with the aim of jointly reaching out to Asia, an undertaking that they want Chile and Colombia to join
The signing of the accord in Lima took place in the presidential palace in the presence of head of state Alan Garcia, Mexican Economy Secretary Bruno Ferrari and Peru’s ministers of Economy, Ismael Benavides; and Foreign Trade, Eduardo Ferreyros, among other officials.
With the signing of the treaty “we feel that we’re recovering this Mexico that we love so much, whose presence in the South American region is going to have revitalizing effects,” Garcia said.
He added that Mexico represents a market of 112 million people, four times Peru’s population and with a GDP of one trillion US dollars the second largest of Latin America.
Peru is associating with “an economy of great dimensions, great growth, great vitality that is linked to the world’s largest economy, the United States” Garcia said.
Mexico’s total exports exceed 300 billion US dollars per year and imports amount to 320 billion, while trade with Peru “was an insignificant 1.41 billion USD in 2010, pointed out Garcia.
He added that “this is a decisive step to draw closer to Mexico, but it is also a preliminary step for a major project on which we’re working with Chile and Colombia, in addition to Mexico”.
The Peruvian president said that the project seeks “a deep integration of our four countries, in the exchange of products and people, to expand towards Asia”.
“After overcoming great obstacles, we’re attaining a shared vision and we’re addressing the common task of building a more prosperous and fair future for our peoples” said Mexico’s minister Ferrari.
He emphasized that Peru has the most dynamic economy in South America and revealed that Mexican firms have invested 3.7 billion USD in the Andean nation.
“At present, trade with Peru creates 23,000 jobs for Mexicans. With the signing of the accord that number can almost double over the next five years with the creation of 17,000 new jobs,” Ferrari said last week as the negotiations in Lima were concluding.
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!
Does this Agreement operate inside CAN rules or outside CAN rules?Apr 09th, 2011 - 08:54 pm 0
And does it help or hinder Mexico's desire to relocate Mexico from North America to South America?
GeoffWard,Apr 10th, 2011 - 04:18 am 0
There's no desire to relocate Mexico at all, the free trade agreement is good for both countries, Mexico has free trade agreements with Europe, Japan, US, Costa Rica, Chile and other countries as well.
The question still stands - but let's make it more specific, for clarity.Apr 10th, 2011 - 01:55 pm 0
If Mexixo makes a Free Trade Agreement with one member of a trading bloc, does this mean a Free Trade Agreement has been made with all other members?
Because, if not, it MUST be to the disadvantage of all the other members (of CAN, in this case).
Or does a Free Trade Agreement attempt to destroy Trading Blocs?
In which case there is no future for CAN and Mercosur - and, by necessary extension, Unasur.
Is the primary desire to destroy supra-national arrangements?
or is it to just get the best deal 'for me, whilst me and everybody else is kicking the Trading Bloc rules to death'?
PS. Mexico, herself, has indicated her desire to re-locate to Mercosur/Unasur and to leave the Northern group.