MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
Milei: the alliance with Washington is the “key” to sovereignty over the Falklands
Argentine President Javier Milei said on Monday that his government's alignment with the United States will advance Argentina's sovereignty claim over the Falklands, in remarks to Radio Mitre. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesDelusional. when will it sink in to their thick skulls that sovereignty is not up for debate.
Aug 03rd, 2026 - 09:11 pm - Link - Report abuse +2It won’t.
Aug 03rd, 2026 - 09:50 pm - Link - Report abuse +2He is trying to claim a win where none exists and he knows that.
Par for the course I’m afraid.
I particularly liked, ‘Sporting matters are one thing and matters of national identity another’.
Well, not when you display a banner like that at a world cup match, they are not.
He knows that as well.
Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work
Aug 04th, 2026 - 01:01 am - Link - Report abuse +2Political suicide for an Argentine politician to admit that the Falklands aren't Argentinian. Their constitution forbids it.
Aug 04th, 2026 - 10:07 am - Link - Report abuse +1.
Falklands - The Futility of Negotiating Sovereignty With Argentina (1 pg) : https://www.academia.edu/57344689/Falklands_The_Futility_of_Negotiating_Sovereignty_With_Argentina
‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’
Aug 04th, 2026 - 11:07 pm - Link - Report abuse +1Err, sorry, but the sentence seems somewhat, incomplete, doesn’t really make any sense?
Or are you pissed?
And yet you got two votes?
Election time again next year in Argentina, so politicians resort to the old chestnut of a mythical Malvinas fantasy. oh so predictable,
Aug 05th, 2026 - 09:53 am - Link - Report abuse 0“Err, sorry, but the sentence seems somewhat, incomplete, doesn’t really make any sense?”
Aug 05th, 2026 - 08:00 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Hitting to close to home, Clinker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caa0SqaRA5g
Neither does that post make any sense.
Aug 05th, 2026 - 10:26 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You are becoming increasingly incoherent.
Perhaps you should get yourself checked out, or lay off the booze for a while.
“Neither does that post make any sense.”
Aug 06th, 2026 - 03:47 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Of course it doesn't to you, as you have no facts to refute my proven assertions
Opinions are like buts, every one has got one. Just some stink more than others.
Fact:
A fact is something that is true and can be verified.
It is objective, meaning it doesn’t depend on personal feelings or interpretations.
Facts can be proven through evidence or reliable sources.
Example: Water boils at 100°C at sea level. This is a scientific fact that can be measured and tested.
Opinion:
An opinion is a belief, view, or judgment formed by someone.
It is subjective, meaning it is influenced by personal feelings, experiences, or preferences.
Opinions can’t be proven true or false because they are based on individual perspectives.
'Clinker', it's understandable. why you would deny such a reality. Hits to close to home.
Yes, well, irrespective of the definitions of ‘facts’ and ‘opinions’, which was never in question anyway:
Aug 06th, 2026 - 11:18 pm - Link - Report abuse 0‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’
Does not make any sense, does it? No it doesn't
Would you care to explain it?
The comment that is, not your responses to being questioned.
Your inference is they are not full of shit, like you!
Aug 07th, 2026 - 12:26 am - Link - Report abuse 0I’m not ‘inferring’ anything, I’m asking what you mean by the statement:
Aug 08th, 2026 - 12:10 am - Link - Report abuse 0‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’.
Which doesn’t make sense in English, however you define ‘facts’ and ‘opinions’.
Would you care to explain what it is supposed to mean?
“Which doesn’t make sense in English”
Aug 08th, 2026 - 10:49 am - Link - Report abuse 0Based on your unqualified opinion?
They both literaly and figrativily spew extrerment. Like you they are unable to substantiate their claims.
So you nicely into their composite of inveterate lying.
There you go again:
Aug 08th, 2026 - 10:24 pm - Link - Report abuse 0‘So you nicely into their composite of inveterate lying’.
Which doesn’t make sense, the sentence seems incomplete.
So are you saying that:
‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’.
Is supposed to mean:
‘They both literaly and figrativily spew extrerment’, yes?
Get yourself checked out mate, or at least use the spell check.
But, such triviality!
Aug 08th, 2026 - 10:54 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Equity regards substance rather than form.
”It used to be we thought that people who went around correcting other people's grammar were just plain annoying. Now there's evidence they are actually ill, suffering from a type of obsessive-compulsive disorder/oppositional defiant disorder (OCD/ODD). Researchers are calling it Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome, or GPS.“S illinois.edu/blog/view/25/76120
“Grammar Pedantry Syndrome” is a form of OCD in which sufferers need to correct every grammatical error.” twitter.com/uberfacts/status/218151002707206145
“A pedant is a person who is excessively concerned with formalism, accuracy, ... ” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant
Pugol-H the Ingratiator
Still can't get over your first attack on me Jun 15th, 2020 when you got you blown right out of the water. Leaving you a sore loser ever since. You are so devastated you have never touched a factual issue since. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side.
Actually, I was talking about your spelling, for which there is no excuse given spell check.
Aug 08th, 2026 - 11:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Although your grammar is bad and your syntax is appalling.
Added to which now your sentences don’t make sense even allowing for all the above.
And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.
And you have been paying the price for it ever since.
‘literaly and figrativily spew extrermently
You will recall my repost at the time:
‘Terence Hill
“Since its impossible to be anything else, as it can never be “both or neither..”
I think you’ll find Schrodinger had a different view about that, apparently it’s the measurement problem, counted in cats would you believe.’
And as ever since then, I was right and you were wrong.
“And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.”
Aug 09th, 2026 - 06:00 am - Link - Report abuse 0You're an absollute liar. The reverse was true. Here is your orignal failure and the why and wherefore.
“Oh dear, the only thing I find is you were thoroughly thrashed. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side. Let me remind you of your utter failing to defeat my claim “not proven” is not available to a claimant.
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/06/06/pirralha-blasts-bolsonaro-for-failing-to-manage-the-coronavirus-pandemic/comments#comment509405
I refer you to DemonTree’s post just below yours:
Aug 09th, 2026 - 03:07 pm - Link - Report abuse 0‘Terry just doesn't get it. He's like those cargo cultists who build something plane-shaped out of random materials and then expect it to fly. He's seen that people make arguments, accuse others of fallacies etc, but doesn't understand what an argument actually is, or the different contexts of a courtroom vs a formal debate vs chatting on a forum. So he treats it like a word game: if he can find a quote with the words he wants, then the context or meaning is irrelevant and he's 'won'.’
‘but doesn't understand what an argument actually is’.
‘if he can find a quote with the words he wants’, then the context or meaning is irrelevant and he's 'won'’.
That says it all really.
‘literaly and figrativily spew extrerment’.
“And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.”
Aug 09th, 2026 - 03:40 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You're an absollute liar. The reverse was true. Here is your orignal failure and the why and wherefore.
“Oh dear, the only thing I find is you were thoroughly thrashed. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side. Let me remind you of your utter failing to defeat my claim “not proven” is not available to a claimant.
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/06/06/pirralha-blasts-bolsonaro-for-failing-to-manage-the-coronavirus-pandemic/comments#comment509405
Now you’re repeating yourself.
Aug 09th, 2026 - 10:57 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I conclude with my favourite posting of yours, which you have repeated very recently:
https://en.mercopress.com/2026/07/10/milei-plans-regional-tour-seeking-investment-with-a-bolsonaro-visit-that-irks-lula/comments#comment534310
servile, subservient, fawning, obsequious, sycophantic, excessively deferential, toadying, ingratiating, unctuous, grovelling, cringing, toadyish, sycophantish, abject, craven, humble, Uriah Heepish, self-abasing; informal slimy, bootlicking, sucky, soapy, forelock-tugging, brown-nosing, apple-polishing, arse-licking, bum-sucking; kiss-ass, ass-kissing, suckholing, unoriginal, uninspired, unimaginative, uninventive, non-innovative, imitative, derivative, creeping Jesus, lickspittle.
Which tells you all you need to know about your intellectual level.
I rest my case.
P. S. You should get yourself checked out, repeating yourself, missing out words in sentences, misspelling even with a spellcheck, could all be something else than your natural stupidity and limited intellect.
All those chemicals you were exposed to Bog cleaning in the cold war, eh.
“I rest my case”
Aug 10th, 2026 - 11:01 am - Link - Report abuse 0You might as well since you haven't dealt with any issues concerning Milei and the Falklands.
But, engaged entirely in an ad hominems. Some of your finest past one's are here, with like minded friends. Who have two self-admitted fascists among them. Makes a perfect illustration of what your all about. https://en.mercopress.com/2020/06/06/pirralha-blasts-bolsonaro-for-failing-to-manage-the-coronavirus-pandemic/comments#comment509405 A man is known by the company he keeps. Happy ranting, I'm delighted to get under your skin Clinker it's certainly well deserved.
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/10/17/brazilian-senator-close-ally-of-bolsonaro-forced-to-resign-over-hidden-cash/comments#comment512332
Aug 10th, 2026 - 01:19 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Thank you for the confirmation of my previous post, and personal atacks that you have ajoined in support of a revealed lying fascist.
Aug 10th, 2026 - 04:09 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Lets show your brave character your off in one your finest moments, what a hero!
See what I mean:
Aug 10th, 2026 - 09:41 pm - Link - Report abuse 0‘your off in one your finest’.
Confused at best.
“See what I mean”
Aug 11th, 2026 - 01:47 am - Link - Report abuse 0You've have just referenced a previous exchange in which I literally hammered seven shades of shit out you.
Keep up the good work. Stupid is as stupid does. Please keep on posting your best losses.
Well, you didn’t, in the real world, as anyone reading those threads can see, and hence your reaction now.
Aug 11th, 2026 - 02:21 pm - Link - Report abuse 0You seem particularly sensitive about your tirade about ‘Brazilian toilet habits:
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/10/17/brazilian-senator-close-ally-of-bolsonaro-forced-to-resign-over-hidden-cash/comments#comment512332
Although you did repeat it many times, so clearly stuck in your head
‘Stupid is as stupid’ does, eh! You mean like:
‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’.
‘literaly and figrativily spew extrerment’. – My favourite this one
‘So you nicely into their composite of inveterate lying’.
‘your off in one your finest’.
All in one thread so it is persistent stupidity, not temporary.
Do you read the Grauniad, by any chance.
“You seem particularly sensitive about your tirade about ‘Brazilian toilet habits”
Aug 11th, 2026 - 02:44 pm - Link - Report abuse 0The issue was in refuting your fascist buddies lying and your subsequent gas lighting.
Then and now, as your own post shows.
”Ana Gabriela Verotti Farah, The Brazil Business, 17 May 2013
Where Do I Put my Toilet Paper? Bathroom Bins
Some people complain about it and say that, besides being weird, this practice is also unhygienic, because people's dirty papers stay there together for a long time instead of being flushed. But it is not that bad. Actually, it is very normal. Simply because we usually don't just throw the paper in the bin; we put a plastic bag inside this bin, and when it gets full – which is the equivalent to say 'constantly' –, it is changed for a new, empty and clear one.
Brazilians don't usually throw away their toilet papers in the own toilet not only because of the trash bins, but also because we are taught that toilets can clog with paper. Also, the sewage system can't cope with the amount of toilet paper that would go straight to the water if it wasn't for the trash bins inside the bathrooms.”
https://thebrazilbusiness.com/article/going-to-the-toilet-in-brazil
Its great when I have the truth on my side, and your constant lying is revealed to all.
Like I said:
Aug 11th, 2026 - 10:02 pm - Link - Report abuse 0‘You seem particularly sensitive about your tirade on ‘Brazilian toilet habits’, ‘although you did repeat it many times’ and have just done so again.
Anyway, never mind that now, over half of your recent posts have contained one or more ‘gibberish sentences’, yes!
So, going forward, in order to help you, because I’m good like that, I’ll review your future postings and alert you to any ‘gibberish sentences’.
So that you can try harder in future or at least use the spellcheck. You won’t feel the embarrassment because of your ‘weapons grade obliviousness’, another DT quote, you may recall.
But it may save you some of the ridicule that upsets you so much.
Oh no, no need to thank me, like I said I’m good like that.
Now concentrate hard, focus, and let’s see if we can produce a ‘gibberish sentence’ free posting.
Off you go and good luck, remember I’ll be here to point out any mistakes, I’m helpful like that.
Its great when I have the truth on my side, and your constant lying is revealed to all.
Aug 11th, 2026 - 10:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Your failure to deny any the accusations of lying, means your silence is acceptance.
“In law, the silence of a party implies his consent.. . qui tacet, consentit-lit. he who is silent agrees. Thus, who keeps silent consents; silence means consent; silent consent is same as expressed consent; consent by conduct is as good as expressed consent. This is an implied term in law....”
SOMA'S DICTIONARY OF LATIN QUOTATIONS MAXIMS AND PHRASES.
Many thanks for you making that crystal clear
Ahh, back to the Latin quotes are we:
Aug 11th, 2026 - 11:33 pm - Link - Report abuse 0As DT said’ ‘if he can find a quote with the words he wants’, then the context or meaning is irrelevant’.
Well remember being thrown in the muddy ditch by the cheering children, after you got thrashed by Pie Face:
https://en.mercopress.com/2026/07/10/milei-plans-regional-tour-seeking-investment-with-a-bolsonaro-visit-that-irks-lula/comments#comment534314
‘It is noted that you do not deny any of my assertions.
Thus they are proven, as silence is acquisition.
‘qui tacet, consentit-lit’, no less!!!
Q. E. D. You got thrown in the muddy ditch, by your own admission.
However, on the upside no ‘gibberish sentences’, you just didn’t realise what you were admitting to.
Anyway, I’ll keep monitoring and let you know if you slip back into gibberish, remember I’ll be here to point out any mistakes, I’m helpful like that.
Q. E. D. You got thrown in the muddy ditch, by your own admission.”
Aug 11th, 2026 - 11:39 pm - Link - Report abuse 0I have never made any such admission. It is you who is making the claim, thus it's your burden, and your obvious sophistry.
No proof no truth.
“An assertion is a statement offered as a conclusion without supporting evidence. Since an argument is defined as a logical relationship between premise and conclusion, a simple assertion is not an argument.”
Ignoring the Burden of Proof http://learn.lexiconic.net/fallacies/index.htm
So stick to what do best, simply sucking.
Ahem, I refer you to your previous post:
Aug 12th, 2026 - 02:16 pm - Link - Report abuse 0https://en.mercopress.com/2026/08/03/milei-the-alliance-with-washington-is-the-key-to-sovereignty-over-the-falklands/comments#comment534456
Your failure to deny the accusations of being thrown in a muddy ditch, means your silence is acceptance.
qui tacet, consentit-lit. he who is silent agrees.
Q. E. D. You got thrown in the muddy ditch, by your own admission.
My mistake, we have another ‘gibberish sentence’ to add to the list:
‘deny any the accusations of’
But don’t worry I’ll check properly in future and point out any more gibberish.
No need to thank me, I’m good like that.
Circular reasoning as there is no place that have claimed I was thrown into muddy ditch.
Aug 12th, 2026 - 08:38 pm - Link - Report abuse 0That was your claim.
No proof no truth.
So you are revealed as liar yet again.
Your failure to deny the accusations of being thrown in a muddy ditch, means your silence is acceptance.
Aug 12th, 2026 - 09:51 pm - Link - Report abuse 0qui tacet, consentit-lit. he who is silent agrees.
Q. E. D. You got thrown in the muddy ditch, by your own admission.
“Your failure to deny the accusations”
Aug 12th, 2026 - 11:35 pm - Link - Report abuse 0Not my obligation.
Fallacious shifting of the burden of proof occurs if someone makes a claim that needs justification, then demands that the opponent justify the opposite of the claim. The opponent has no such burden until evidence is presented for the claim.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof
Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!