MercoPress. South Atlantic News Agency
Milei: the alliance with Washington is the “key” to sovereignty over the Falklands
Argentine President Javier Milei said on Monday that his government's alignment with the United States will advance Argentina's sovereignty claim over the Falklands, in remarks to Radio Mitre. Read full article
Comments
Disclaimer & comment rulesDelusional. when will it sink in to their thick skulls that sovereignty is not up for debate.
Posted 5 days ago - Link - Report abuse +2It won’t.
Posted 5 days ago - Link - Report abuse +2He is trying to claim a win where none exists and he knows that.
Par for the course I’m afraid.
I particularly liked, ‘Sporting matters are one thing and matters of national identity another’.
Well, not when you display a banner like that at a world cup match, they are not.
He knows that as well.
Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work
Posted 5 days ago - Link - Report abuse +2Political suicide for an Argentine politician to admit that the Falklands aren't Argentinian. Their constitution forbids it.
Posted 5 days ago - Link - Report abuse +1.
Falklands - The Futility of Negotiating Sovereignty With Argentina (1 pg) : https://www.academia.edu/57344689/Falklands_The_Futility_of_Negotiating_Sovereignty_With_Argentina
‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’
Posted 4 days ago - Link - Report abuse +1Err, sorry, but the sentence seems somewhat, incomplete, doesn’t really make any sense?
Or are you pissed?
And yet you got two votes?
Election time again next year in Argentina, so politicians resort to the old chestnut of a mythical Malvinas fantasy. oh so predictable,
Posted 4 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0“Err, sorry, but the sentence seems somewhat, incomplete, doesn’t really make any sense?”
Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0Hitting to close to home, Clinker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caa0SqaRA5g
Neither does that post make any sense.
Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0You are becoming increasingly incoherent.
Perhaps you should get yourself checked out, or lay off the booze for a while.
“Neither does that post make any sense.”
Posted 3 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0Of course it doesn't to you, as you have no facts to refute my proven assertions
Opinions are like buts, every one has got one. Just some stink more than others.
Fact:
A fact is something that is true and can be verified.
It is objective, meaning it doesn’t depend on personal feelings or interpretations.
Facts can be proven through evidence or reliable sources.
Example: Water boils at 100°C at sea level. This is a scientific fact that can be measured and tested.
Opinion:
An opinion is a belief, view, or judgment formed by someone.
It is subjective, meaning it is influenced by personal feelings, experiences, or preferences.
Opinions can’t be proven true or false because they are based on individual perspectives.
'Clinker', it's understandable. why you would deny such a reality. Hits to close to home.
Yes, well, irrespective of the definitions of ‘facts’ and ‘opinions’, which was never in question anyway:
Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’
Does not make any sense, does it? No it doesn't
Would you care to explain it?
The comment that is, not your responses to being questioned.
Your inference is they are not full of shit, like you!
Posted 2 days ago - Link - Report abuse 0I’m not ‘inferring’ anything, I’m asking what you mean by the statement:
Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse 0‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’.
Which doesn’t make sense in English, however you define ‘facts’ and ‘opinions’.
Would you care to explain what it is supposed to mean?
“Which doesn’t make sense in English”
Posted 1 day ago - Link - Report abuse 0Based on your unqualified opinion?
They both literaly and figrativily spew extrerment. Like you they are unable to substantiate their claims.
So you nicely into their composite of inveterate lying.
There you go again:
Posted 18 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0‘So you nicely into their composite of inveterate lying’.
Which doesn’t make sense, the sentence seems incomplete.
So are you saying that:
‘Milei and and one other President rely on depends. As he has shown they don't always work’.
Is supposed to mean:
‘They both literaly and figrativily spew extrerment’, yes?
Get yourself checked out mate, or at least use the spell check.
But, such triviality!
Posted 18 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0Equity regards substance rather than form.
”It used to be we thought that people who went around correcting other people's grammar were just plain annoying. Now there's evidence they are actually ill, suffering from a type of obsessive-compulsive disorder/oppositional defiant disorder (OCD/ODD). Researchers are calling it Grammatical Pedantry Syndrome, or GPS.“S illinois.edu/blog/view/25/76120
“Grammar Pedantry Syndrome” is a form of OCD in which sufferers need to correct every grammatical error.” twitter.com/uberfacts/status/218151002707206145
“A pedant is a person who is excessively concerned with formalism, accuracy, ... ” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedant
Pugol-H the Ingratiator
Still can't get over your first attack on me Jun 15th, 2020 when you got you blown right out of the water. Leaving you a sore loser ever since. You are so devastated you have never touched a factual issue since. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side.
Actually, I was talking about your spelling, for which there is no excuse given spell check.
Posted 17 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0Although your grammar is bad and your syntax is appalling.
Added to which now your sentences don’t make sense even allowing for all the above.
And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.
And you have been paying the price for it ever since.
‘literaly and figrativily spew extrermently
You will recall my repost at the time:
‘Terence Hill
“Since its impossible to be anything else, as it can never be “both or neither..”
I think you’ll find Schrodinger had a different view about that, apparently it’s the measurement problem, counted in cats would you believe.’
And as ever since then, I was right and you were wrong.
“And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.”
Posted 11 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0You're an absollute liar. The reverse was true. Here is your orignal failure and the why and wherefore.
“Oh dear, the only thing I find is you were thoroughly thrashed. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side. Let me remind you of your utter failing to defeat my claim “not proven” is not available to a claimant.
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/06/06/pirralha-blasts-bolsonaro-for-failing-to-manage-the-coronavirus-pandemic/comments#comment509405
I refer you to DemonTree’s post just below yours:
Posted 2 hours ago - Link - Report abuse 0‘Terry just doesn't get it. He's like those cargo cultists who build something plane-shaped out of random materials and then expect it to fly. He's seen that people make arguments, accuse others of fallacies etc, but doesn't understand what an argument actually is, or the different contexts of a courtroom vs a formal debate vs chatting on a forum. So he treats it like a word game: if he can find a quote with the words he wants, then the context or meaning is irrelevant and he's 'won'.’
‘but doesn't understand what an argument actually is’.
‘if he can find a quote with the words he wants’, then the context or meaning is irrelevant and he's 'won'’.
That says it all really.
‘literaly and figrativily spew extrerment’.
“And it was you that started on me and for absolutely no reason, I wasn’t even talking to you.”
Posted 1 hour ago - Link - Report abuse 0You're an absollute liar. The reverse was true. Here is your orignal failure and the why and wherefore.
“Oh dear, the only thing I find is you were thoroughly thrashed. Got to be tough when your only reason for being, is to be on what you thought was a winning side. Let me remind you of your utter failing to defeat my claim “not proven” is not available to a claimant.
https://en.mercopress.com/2020/06/06/pirralha-blasts-bolsonaro-for-failing-to-manage-the-coronavirus-pandemic/comments#comment509405
Please log in or register (it’s free!) to comment. Login with Facebook