MercoPress, en Español

Montevideo, January 18th 2021 - 01:28 UTC

 

 

Mercosur summit to deal with Venezuela inclusion and obstacles to trade

Monday, December 19th 2011 - 07:29 UTC
Full article 3 comments
The Mercosur main building in Montevideo The Mercosur main building in Montevideo

A two day Mercosur summit begins Monday in Montevideo with Foreign Affairs ministers meeting Monday and the presidents on Tuesday when the rotating chair will be passed from Uruguay to Argentina for the next six month.

“Besides the specific points of the agenda and legal elaborations what really matters are the political definitions that the four presidents behind closed doors will decide on Tuesday”, said Uruguayan minister Luis Almagro.

The political direction of Mercosur, how it is evolving from an institutional point of view and what is needed to consolidate the expanded market and have a more prominent profile in world affairs, are probably the main issues to be addressed at the summit according to Uruguayan sources.

The global financial crisis will also be debated which is particularly significant since the major partners of the block have adopted measures to safeguard their own markets and industry and thus hindering trade with the junior partners, Paraguay and Uruguay.

Uruguay is facing growing obstacles for manufactured exports to both Argentina and Brazil, and Paraguay has been unable to stamp the deal tot sell power to Uruguay, an initiative blocked by Argentina through whose grid the interconnection would take place.

So far the four presidents from the founding full member countries, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay have confirmed attendance to the host Uruguay and President Jose Mujica. Ecuador’s Rafael Correa, who recently announced intention of becoming a full Mercosur member is also expected.

Precisely the incorporation mechanism for new associates is one of the points in the agenda, according to President Mujica who revealed there have been discussions with Argentina and Brazil to review the “legal criteria” so as to ensure the final incorporation of Venezuela which remains blocked by the Paraguayan Senate.

The Legislatives of the three other members have long voted positively on the motion.

Venezuela incorporation to the block was approved in 2006 at presidential level but the Paraguayan legislative under control of the opposition to President Fernando Lugo has been refusing to take a vote on the issue.

Only a week ago Marco Aurelio Garcia the Brazilian presidency advisor on foreign affairs admitted that there is discontent with the Paraguayan parliament delay in approving the incorporation of Venezuela.

The access of new members to the block is regulated by the Mercosur charter from 1991 which demands a unanimous approval from the Executive and Legislative branches of current members.

“Modifying the mechanism is a complex juridical solution but not impossible” said Uruguayan sources

“Uruguay has always been a great defender of consensus in Mercosur, but if a country has been requesting for five years and still can’t come in, a solution must be found. Particularly if all the negotiations process has concluded”, said Uruguayan sources.

 

Top Comments

Disclaimer & comment rules
  • GeoffWard2

    .
    Mercosur is defunct.
    Perhaps Venezuela can make it funct
    Flying pigs.

    Dec 19th, 2011 - 12:30 pm 0
  • O gara

    As usual Geoffrey your play on words suggests knowledge but the result is a complete lack of substance.Mercosur was never in better shape.Trade bewtween the partners is growing at extremely high levels.Argentina and Brasil will trade 40 billion dollars worth of goods in 2011.Uruguay-Argentina trade has doubled in five years,Paraguay trade with the rest of the block is up 29% in 2011.
    Funcked no Geoffrey thats the EU you are thinking off

    Dec 20th, 2011 - 05:42 pm 0
  • GeoffWard2

    Mercosur has failed totally and spectacularly to trade as a bloc with the world beyond.
    Its partners have broken all its own internal and external trading rules to trade as individual nations, brokering grossly sub-optimal deals because of their rejection of group-strength.
    There are many reasons, and I know you know some of them.

    Dec 20th, 2011 - 09:04 pm 0
Read all comments

Commenting for this story is now closed.
If you have a Facebook account, become a fan and comment on our Facebook Page!